...
首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >Resting energy expenditure in severely burned children: analysis of agreement between indirect calorimetry and prediction equations using the Bland-Altman method.
【24h】

Resting energy expenditure in severely burned children: analysis of agreement between indirect calorimetry and prediction equations using the Bland-Altman method.

机译:严重烧伤儿童的静息能量消耗:使用Bland-Altman方法的间接量热法和预测方程之间的一致性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of a child's resting energy expenditure (REE) is essential in optimizing nutritional support for severely burned children. The provision of adequate nutritional support is vital in order to avoid the consequences of malnutrition or overfeeding. Nutritional requirements for severely burned children are often based on equations for estimates of REE. The accuracy of the predictive equations of REE has been questioned and many authors have advocated the measurement of REE. This study tests the hypothesis that estimates of REE vary significantly from measured REE (MREE) in a population of severely burned children, and are not accurate for determining nutritional requirements. METHODS: In 91 severely burned children aged between 3 and 18 years, REE was measured by indirect calorimetry (MREE) at the height of the hypermetabolic response and compared with predicted equations (PREE) from the Food and Agriculture/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU), Schofield-HW and Harris-Benedict. Agreement between indirect calorimetry and predicted equations was assessed following the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: In the entire cohort group, predicted REE from all three equations were significantly lower compared to MREE (p<0.05). There was poor agreement between the MREE and predicted using all three equations. The Schofield-HW equation showed the lowest mean MREE-PREE difference: 635+/-526 kcal/day (limits of agreement -608 and 1878 kcal/day; 95% confidence interval for the bias 525-745 kcal/day). Additionally, all three equations under predicted REE and were not significantly different from one another (p=0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Until more accurate predicted equations are developed, we recommend indirect calorimetry measurements for determining resting energy expenditure in severely burned children.
机译:简介:了解儿童的静息能量消耗(REE)对于优化严重烧伤儿童的营养支持至关重要。为了避免营养不良或过度喂养的后果,提供足够的营养支持至关重要。严重烧伤儿童的营养需求通常基于估算稀土元素的方程式。稀土元素预测方程的准确性受到质疑,许多作者提倡稀土元素的测量。这项研究检验了以下假设:在严重烧伤的儿童群体中,REE的估算值与测得的REE(MREE)显着不同,并且不能准确确定营养需求。方法:在91名3至18岁的严重烧伤儿童中,通过代谢分析法在代谢亢进高度处测量REE,并与粮食及农业/世界卫生组织/联合国的预测方程式(PREE)进行比较大学(FAO / WHO / UNU),Schofield-HW和Harris-Benedict。间接量热法和预测方程之间的一致性是根据Bland-Altman方法进行评估的。结果:在整个队列研究组中,所有三个方程式预测的REE均显着低于MREE(p <0.05)。 MREE与使用所有三个方程式预测的结果之间的一致性差。 Schofield-HW方程显示最低的MREE-PREE平均差异:635 +/- 526 kcal /天(一致极限-608和1878 kcal /天;偏差525-745 kcal /天的95%置信区间)。此外,所有三个方程均在预测的REE下且彼此之间无显着差异(p = 0.98)。结论:在开发出更准确的预测方程之前,我们建议间接量热法测量以确定严重烧伤儿童的静息能量消耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号