首页> 外文期刊>Experimental aging research >INTACT EPISODIC RETRIEVAL IN OLDER ADULTS: EVIDENCE FROM AN AUDITORY NEGATIVE PRIMING TASK
【24h】

INTACT EPISODIC RETRIEVAL IN OLDER ADULTS: EVIDENCE FROM AN AUDITORY NEGATIVE PRIMING TASK

机译:老年人中完整的癫痫发作检索:来自听觉阴性启动任务的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Context: The negative priming effect has been traditionally interpreted as the inhibitory aftereffect of distractor processing. According to inhibitory deficit theory, older adults should be more impaired by auditory distractors. Recent studies have shown that episodic retrieval processes are involved in the effect. However, so far there is no direct evidence that this is true for older adults. Methods: In an auditory four-alternative identification task, young adults (18-30 years), younger seniors (60-67 years), and older seniors (68-78 years) identified target sounds while ignoring distractor sounds. In ignored repetition trials, the prime distractor was repeated as the probe target, whereas there was no stimulus repetition in control trials. Reaction times and errors were analyzed. Results: Negative priming was present in all age groups. Senior groups showed increased negative priming in reaction times. All age groups revealed a comparable increase of probe errors with the former prime response in ignored repetition compared with control trials. There was no age difference in the frequency of responding with the former prime response in control trials. Conclusion: An increase in prime response errors in ignored repetition trials is consistent with the involvement of episodic retrieval processes in negative priming in younger and older adults. Inconsistent with both an inhibitory account of negative priming and the inhibitory deficit theory of cognitive aging, older adults neither showed evidence of reduced negative priming nor of impaired restraint control.
机译:研究背景:负启动效应在传统上被解释为干扰物加工的抑制后效。根据抑制缺陷理论,听觉干扰因素应使老年人受到更大的损害。最近的研究表明,情景检索过程涉及该效应。但是,到目前为止,尚无直接证据表明这对老年人是正确的。方法:在听觉四项识别任务中,年轻人(18至30岁),年轻人(60至67岁)和老年人(68至78岁)在识别目标声音的同时忽略了干扰音。在被忽略的重复试验中,主要干扰因素被重复作为探测目标,而对照试验中没有刺激重复。分析了反应时间和错误。结果:在所有年龄段均存在阴性致敏。老年人组在反应时间中显示出更大的负引发能力。与对照试验相比,所有年龄组的被测重复均显示出与以前的主要应答相比,探针错误的增加幅度相当。在对照试验中,对先前主要反应的反应频率没有年龄差异。结论:被忽略的重复试验中主要反应错误的增加与年轻人和老年人在负性激发中的情节检索过程有关。与否定性启动抑制和认知衰老的抑制性缺陷理论都不一致,老年人既没有显示出降低负性启动的证据,也没有约束力控制受损的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号