...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Quantitative analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony using cardiac computed tomography versus three-dimensional echocardiography
【24h】

Quantitative analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony using cardiac computed tomography versus three-dimensional echocardiography

机译:心脏计算机断层扫描与三维超声心动图定量分析左心室不同步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives We investigated whether cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can determine intraventricular dyssynchrony in comparison to real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) in patients who are considered for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Methods 35 patients considered for CRT were examined. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was quantified by calculating the standard deviation index (SDI) of 17 myocardial LV segments by RT3DE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced 64-slice dual-source CCT. For both analyses the same software algorithm (4D LV-Analysis) was used. Results Close correlations were observed for end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction between the two techniques (r=0.94, r=0.92 and r=0.95, respectively, P<0.001 for all). For the global dyssynchrony index SDI, a high correlation was found between RT3DE and CCT (r=0.84, P<0.001), which further increased after exclusion of segments with poor image quality by echocardiography (r=0.90, P<0.001). The required time for quantitative analysis was significantly shorter (162±22 s vs. 608± 112 s per patient, P<0.001) and reproducibility was significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE (interobserver variability of 4.5±3.1% vs. 7.9±6.1%, P<0.05). Conclusion Quantitative assessment of LV dyssynchrony is feasible by CCT. Owing to its higher reproducibility and faster analysis time compared with RT3DE, this technique may represent a valuable alternative for dyssynchrony assessment. Key Points ? Quantitative assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible by cardiac computed tomography (CCT). ? This technique has been compared with real-time threedimensional echocardiography (RT3DE). ? Reproducibility is significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE. ? Time spent for analysis is significantly shorter for CCT. ? Computed tomography may represent a valuable alternative to ultrasound for dyssynchrony assessment.
机译:目的我们调查了在考虑进行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者中,与实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)相比,心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)是否能确定心室内不同步。方法对35例考虑进行CRT的患者进行检查。通过RT3DE和ECG门控增强对比64层双源CCT计算17个心肌LV节段的标准偏差指数(SDI),对左心室(LV)不同步进行定量。对于这两种分析,使用相同的软件算法(4D LV分析)。结果观察到两种技术之间的收缩末期容积,舒张末期容积和左室射血分数密切相关(分别为r = 0.94,r = 0.92和r = 0.95,所有情况均P <0.001)。对于全球不同步指数SDI,发现RT3DE与CCT之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.84,P <0.001),在通过超声心动图排除图像质量较差的节段后,其进一步升高(r = 0.90,P <0.001)。与RT3DE相比,CCT的定量分析所需的时间显着缩短(162±22 s对每位患者的608±112 s,P <0.001),重现性显着更高(观察者间的差异为4.5±3.1%对7.9±6.1)。 %,P <0.05)。结论CCT定量评估左室不同步是可行的。与RT3DE相比,由于它具有更高的可重复性和更快的分析时间,该技术可能代表了不同步评估的一种有价值的替代方法。关键点 ?通过心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)定量评估左心室不同步是可行的。 ?该技术已与实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)进行了比较。 ?与RT3DE相比,CCT的重现性明显更高。 ?用于CCT的分析时间大大缩短。 ?计算机断层扫描可能是超声不同步评估的一种有价值的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号