...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Evaluation of computer-aided detection and dual energy software in detection of peripheral pulmonary embolism on dual-energy pulmonary CT angiography.
【24h】

Evaluation of computer-aided detection and dual energy software in detection of peripheral pulmonary embolism on dual-energy pulmonary CT angiography.

机译:在双能肺部CT血管造影上评估计算机辅助检测和双能软件在检测周围性肺栓塞中的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity of computer-aided detection(CAD) and dual-energy software('Lung PBV', 'Lung Vessels') for detecting peripheral pulmonary embolism(PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Jan-2007 and Jan-2008, 309 patients underwent dual-energy CT angiography(DECTA) for the evaluation of suspected PE. Among them, 37 patients were retrospectively selected; 21 with PE at segmental-or-below levels and 16 without PE according to clinical reports. A standard computer assisted detection (CAD) package and two new types of software('Lung PBV', 'Lung Vessels') were applied on a dedicated workstation. This resulted in four alternative tests for detecting PE: DECTA alone and DECTA with CAD, 'Lung Vessels' and 'Lung PBV'. Two radiologists independently read all cases at different reading sessions. Two thoracic radiologists set the reference standard by combining all information from DECTA and software. The sensitivity of detection for all, segmental and subsegmental-or-below PE were assessed. RESULTS: The reference standard contained 136 PE(segmental 65, subsegmental-or-below 71). With DECTA alone, the sensitivity of detection for all, segmental and subsegmental-or-below pulmonary arteries was 54.5%/73.7%/34.4%; DECTA with CAD, 57.8%/76.8%/37.9%; DECTA with 'Lung PBV', 61.1%/79.9%/41.4%; DECTA with 'Lung Vessels', 64.0%/78.3%/48.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of CAD, Lung Vessels and Lung PBV shows improved capability to detect peripheral PE.
机译:目的:评估计算机辅助检测(CAD)和双能软件(“肺PBV”,“肺血管”)检测周围性肺栓塞(PE)的敏感性。材料与方法:2007年1月至2008年1月,对309例患者进行了双能量CT血管造影(DECTA),以评估可疑PE。其中回顾性选择37例患者。根据临床报告,有21例PE处于节段或以下水平,而16例无PE。在专用工作站上应用了标准的计算机辅助检测(CAD)软件包和两种新型软件(“ Lung PBV”,“ Lung Vessels”)。这导致了四种用于检测PE的替代测试:单独的DECTA和带有CAD,“肺血管”和“肺PBV”的DECTA。两名放射科医生在不同的阅读时段独立阅读所有病例。两名胸腔放射科医生通过结合DECTA和软件中的所有信息来设置参考标准。评估了所有,节段性和节段性或以下PE的检测敏感性。结果:该参考标准包含136 PE(细分为65,低于或低于71)。仅使用DECTA,对所有,节段和节段或以下肺动脉的检测敏感性为54.5%/ 73.7%/ 34.4%; DECTA加CAD,57.8%/ 76.8%/ 37.9%; DECTA'肺PBV',61.1%/ 79.9%/ 41.4%; DECTA拥有“肺血管”,分别为64.0%/ 78.3%/ 48.5%。结论:CAD,肺血管和肺PBV的使用显示出改善的检测外周PE的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号