首页> 外文期刊>European psychiatry: the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists >Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: A systematic review of self-reported instruments
【24h】

Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: A systematic review of self-reported instruments

机译:精神科住院患者满意度评估:自我报告工具的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: There is a growing concern about satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric services. There are currently numerous satisfaction instruments available to psychiatric inpatients, but little guidance on which among them to select. Aims: To provide an overview of the psychometric properties and the content of satisfaction instruments available to psychiatric inpatients. Methods: Systematic searches of Medline database to identify inpatient satisfaction questionnaires. Assessment of the instruments according to relevant psychometric properties. Results: Fifteen satisfaction instruments were identified. The target population differed according to the instrument. Methods used to generate items were heterogeneous. These instruments were based on a mixed approach including patients' points of view, expert opinions, and literature reviews, causing the content of questionnaires to vary. Reliability and validity were not systematically tested. Conclusion: The validation of a common inpatient satisfaction instrument is a major challenge. Recommendations for the future development of satisfaction instruments may include: item generation based exclusively on the patient's point of view; a validation process on a large and representative population; and an instrument combining generic (core questionnaire) and specific (additional modules) approaches.
机译:背景:人们对住院精神科服务满意度的担忧日益增加。当前,精神病住院患者可使用多种满意度工具,但是对于从中选择哪种满意度指南却很少。目的:概述精神病学特性以及精神病住院患者可用的满意度工具的内容。方法:系统搜索Medline数据库以识别住院患者满意度问卷。根据相关的心理计量学特性对仪器进行评估。结果:确定了十五种满意度工具。目标人群因工具而异。用于生成项目的方法是异构的。这些工具基于混合方法,包括患者的观点,专家的意见和文献综述,从而导致问卷的内容有所不同。信度和效度未经过系统测试。结论:通用住院病人满意度仪器的验证是一个重大挑战。对满意度工具未来发展的建议可能包括:仅根据患者的观点生成项目;针对大量具有代表性的人群的验证过程;以及将通用方法(核心问卷)和特定方法(附加模块)相结合的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号