首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Emergency department investigation of deep vein thrombosis.
【24h】

Emergency department investigation of deep vein thrombosis.

机译:急诊科调查深静脉血栓形成。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To apply a previously validated clinical model for predicting pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to patients attending an emergency department with symptoms suggestive of DVT and assess its reproducibility in the patient population. To measure the diagnostic value of the SimpliRED D-dimer assay in effectively excluding DVT. METHOD: Prospective study between March 1999 and October 2000 of adult patients attending with suspected DVT. Patients were assessed using Wells' clinical prediction tool and risk stratified. SimpliRED D-dimer estimations were then performed and compression ultrasonography arranged. The pre-test probabilities of DVT in the low, moderate, and high risk groups of Wells' original cohort were compared with the authors' figures and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the SimpliRED assay calculated for the patient population. RESULTS: Application of Wells' criteria to patients in the department permitted stratification into high, moderate, and low risk groups (prevalence of DVT 58.3%, 8.9%, and 1.5% respectively). SimpliRED D-dimer assay sensitivity was 63.4% with specificity of 74.8%, with a likelihood ratio of 2.52 for a positive test and 0.49 for a negative test. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical risk stratification allowed patients to be categorised into high, moderate, and low risk groups, albeit with less discriminatory power than originally described by Wells. The low sensitivity of the SimpliRED D-dimer assay when used routinely in a busy emergency department raises substantial doubt over the use of this test to rule out DVT, even in low risk patients.
机译:目的:将先前验证过的临床模型用于预测就诊具有深静脉血栓形成症状的急诊科患者的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的测试前可能性,并评估其在患者人群中的可重复性。要测量SimpliRED D-二聚体测定法在有效排除DVT中的诊断价值。方法:前瞻性研究于1999年3月至2000年10月期间对疑似DVT的成年患者进行治疗。使用Wells的临床预测工具对患者进行评估,并对风险进行分层。然后进行简化的D-二聚体估计,并安排超声检查。将Wells原始队列的低,中和高风险组中DVT的测试前概率与作者的数据以及针对患者人群计算的SimpliRED分析的敏感性,特异性和预测值进行了比较。结果:对科室患者应用韦尔斯标准可将患者分为高,中和低风险人群(DVT的患病率分别为58.3%,8.9%和1.5%)。简化的D-二聚体测定灵敏度为63.4%,特异性为74.8%,阳性试验的似然比为2.52,阴性试验的似然比为0.49。结论:临床风险分层允许将患者分为高,中和低风险组,尽管其辨别力低于Wells最初描述的能力。当在繁忙的急诊科中常规使用SimpliRED D-二聚体测定法时,其灵敏度低,甚至对于低危患者而言,都对使用该试验排除DVT提出了很大的怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号