首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management.
【24h】

Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management.

机译:吠错树了吗?狗咬伤伤口处理调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Several trials have been published examining the role of antibiotics in dog bite wound management. A meta-analysis of these suggests that there is very little benefit to routine antibiotic prescription in these patients. All papers however incorporated rigorous wound care regimens involving large volume irrigation. METHODS: The authors undertook a telephone survey to investigate wound care and prescribing practice in bite wound management in accident and emergency and minor injury units in the Yorkshire region. RESULTS: Twenty one departments were contacted. Only 10% of departments routinely irrigate these wounds. Antibiotics are prescribed routinely in 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Management of dog bite wounds would not seem to be evidence based in most departments in this sample.
机译:目的:已经发表了一些试验来检验抗生素在狗咬伤伤口处理中的作用。对这些患者的荟萃分析表明,这些患者使用常规抗生素处方几乎没有益处。但是,所有论文都采用了涉及大量冲洗的严格伤口护理方案。方法:作者进行了一项电话调查,以调查约克郡地区事故,紧急情况和轻伤部门的咬伤管理中的伤口护理和处方实践。结果:与二十一个部门联系。只有10%的部门会定期冲洗这些伤口。常规使用抗生素的比例为71%。结论:在本样本的大多数部门中,犬咬伤的处理似乎不是证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号