首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Emergency Medicine >Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management
【2h】

Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management

机译:吠错树了吗?狗咬伤伤口处理调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Several trials have been published examining the role of antibiotics in dog bite wound management. A meta-analysis of these suggests that there is very little benefit to routine antibiotic prescription in these patients. All papers however incorporated rigorous wound care regimens involving large volume irrigation. >Methods: The authors undertook a telephone survey to investigate wound care and prescribing practice in bite wound management in accident and emergency and minor injury units in the Yorkshire region. >Results: Twenty one departments were contacted. Only 10% of departments routinely irrigate these wounds. Antibiotics are prescribed routinely in 71%. >Conclusions: Management of dog bite wounds would not seem to be evidence based in most departments in this sample.
机译:>目标:已经发布了一些试验来检验抗生素在狗咬伤伤口处理中的作用。对这些患者的荟萃分析表明,这些患者使用常规抗生素处方几乎没有益处。但是,所有论文都采用了涉及大量冲洗的严格伤口护理方案。 >方法:作者进行了一项电话调查,以调查约克郡地区事故,紧急情况和轻伤部门的咬伤管理中的伤口护理和处方实践。 >结果:已与21个部门联系。只有10%的部门定期冲洗这些伤口。常规使用抗生素的比例为71%。 >结论:在本样本的大多数部门中,管理犬咬伤似乎不是证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号