...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >How accurate are predicted waiting times, determined upon a patient's arrival in the Emergency Department?
【24h】

How accurate are predicted waiting times, determined upon a patient's arrival in the Emergency Department?

机译:当患者到达急诊室时,预计的等待时间有多准确?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Information regarding waiting times has been shown to be a key determinant of patient satisfaction. This study aimed to examine the potential accuracy of predicted waiting times determined on the patient's arrival in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods A retrospective study of 50 000 consecutive patients attending a single ED was undertaken. A linear regression model was developed to predict waiting times, assessing a number of different measures derived from the waiting times of patients seen immediately prior to an individual patient's time of arrival. To assess the fit of the model, the mean absolute difference between the patient's actual and predicted waiting times was determined. Results 6726 patients had incomplete data and were excluded from the analysis. The mean waiting time across all streams was 64.6 (SD 43.7) min. The best performing linear regression model used two variables to predict a patient's waiting time, calculated across the entire sample of patients. This model predicted 27% of the variability in waiting time. The mean absolute difference between actual and predicted waiting times across all streams was 29.0 (SD 23.5) min. The mean absolute difference in waiting times was similar across the streams. Conclusions There is a considerable difference between predicted and actual waiting times using this method. Further investigation is required to determine whether such a degree of inaccuracy is acceptable to patients and improves satisfaction more than the provision of no information regarding waiting times.
机译:有关等待时间的背景信息已被证明是患者满意度的关键因素。这项研究旨在检查在患者到达急诊室(ED)时确定的预计等待时间的潜在准确性。方法回顾性研究5万名连续接受单次ED治疗的患者。开发了线性回归模型来预测等待时间,评估从从单个患者到达时间之前立即看到的患者的等待时间得出的许多不同度量。为了评估模型的拟合度,确定了患者实际等待时间与预测等待时间之间的平均绝对差。结果6726例患者的数据不完整,被排除在分析之外。所有流的平均等待时间为64.6(SD 43.7)分钟。表现最佳的线性回归模型使用两个变量来预测患者的等待时间,该变量是在整个患者样本中计算得出的。该模型预测了等待时间变异的27%。所有数据流的实际等待时间和预测等待时间之间的平均绝对差为29.0(SD 23.5)分钟。流之间等待时间的平均绝对差异相似。结论使用这种方法,预计和实际等待时间之间存在很大差异。与没有提供有关等待时间的信息相比,需要进一步的调查来确定患者是否可以接受这种程度的误差,并提高满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号