首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.
【24h】

Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.

机译:人工椎间盘置换装置的生物摩擦学评估:体外磨损模拟过程中载荷和运动方式的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wear simulation is an essential pre-clinical method to predict the mid- and long-term clinical wear behavior of newly introduced devices for total disc arthroplasty. The main requirement of a suitable method for spinal wear simulation has to be the ability to distinguish between design concepts and allow for a direct comparison of predicate devices. The objective of our study was to investigate the influence of loading and kinematic patterns based on two different protocols for spinal wear simulation (ISO/FDIS 18192-1 (2006) and ASTM F2423-05). In vitro wear simulation was performed with six activ L lumbar artificial disc devices (Aesculap Tuttlingen, Germany). The applied kinematic pattern of movement was multidirectional for ISO (elliptic track) and unidirectional with a curvilinear shape for ASTM. Testing was done for 10 million cycles in the ISO loading mode and afterwards with the same specimens for 5 million cycles according to the ASTM protocol with a customized six-station servohydraulic spinal wear simulator (EndoLab Thansau, Germany). Gravimetrical and geometrical wear assessment, a slide track analysis correlated to an optical surface characterization, and an estimation of particle size and morphology were performed. The gravimetric wear rate for the first 10 million cycles was ISO(initial) = 2.7 +/- 0.3 mg/million cycles. During the ASTM test period (10-15 million cycles) a gravimetric wear rate of 0.14 +/- 0.06 mg/million cycles was estimated. The wear rates between the ISO and ASTM driven simulations differ substantially (approximately 20-fold) and statistical analysis demonstrates a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the test groups. The main explanation of divergency between ISO and ASTM driven wear simulations is the multidirectional pattern of movement described in the ISO document resulting in a cross-shear stress on the polyethylene material. Due to previous retrieval observations, it seems to be very unlikely that a lumbar artificial disc is loaded with a linear wear path.Testing according to ASTM F2423-05 with pure unidirectional motion does not reflect the kinematics of TDA patients' daily activities. Based on our findings it seems to be more reliable to predict the clinical wear behavior of an artificial disc replacement using the ISO/FDIS 18192-1 method.
机译:磨损模拟是一种临床前必不可少的方法,可以预测新推出的全椎间盘置换装置的中长期临床磨损行为。脊柱磨损模拟的合适方法的主要要求是必须能够区分设计概念并允许直接比较谓词设备。我们研究的目的是基于两种不同的脊椎磨损模拟协议(ISO / FDIS 18192-1(2006)和ASTM F2423-05),研究载荷和运动模式的影响。用六个Activ L腰椎间盘人工器械(德国Aesculap Tuttlingen)进行了体外磨损模拟。所应用的运动学运动模式对于ISO(椭圆轨道)是多向的,对于ASTM是曲线呈单向的。测试是在ISO加载模式下进行1000万次循环,然后根据ASTM协议使用定制的六工位伺服液压脊椎磨损模拟器(德国EndoLab Thansau)对相同的样本进行500万次循环。进行了重量和几何磨损评估,与光学表面表征相关的滑轨分析以及颗粒尺寸和形态的估算。前一千万个循环的重量磨损率为ISO(初始)= 2.7 +/- 0.3 mg /百万个循环。在ASTM测试期间(10-15百万个循环),重量磨损率估计为0.14 +/- 0.06 mg /百万个循环。 ISO和ASTM驱动的模拟之间的磨损率相差很大(大约20倍),统计分析表明测试组之间存在显着差异(p <0.001)。 ISO和ASTM驱动的磨损模拟之间差异的主要解释是ISO文件中描述的多向运动模式,导致聚乙烯材料上的交叉剪切应力。由于以前的观察发现,腰椎人工椎间盘装载线性磨损路径的可能性很小。按照ASTM F2423-05进行纯单向运动测试不能反映TDA患者日常活动的运动学。根据我们的发现,使用ISO / FDIS 18192-1方法预测人工椎间盘置换的临床磨损行为似乎更为可靠。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号