...
【24h】

Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

机译:腰椎前凸在强直性脊柱炎中的影像学测量可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of the several different methods to measure lumbar lordosis have been reported. However, it has not been studied sofar in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).We evaluated the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of six specific measures of global lumbar lordosis in patients with AS. Ninety-one consecutive patients with AS who met the most recently modified New York criteria were enrolled and underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of whole spine. The radiographs were divided into non-ankylosis (no bony bridge in the lumbar spine), incomplete ankylosis (lumbar spines were partially connected by bony bridge) and complete ankylosis groups to evaluate the reliability of the Cobb L1-S1, Cobb L1-L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1-S1, posterior tangent L1-L5, and TRALL methods.The radiographs were composed of 39 non-ankylosis, 27 incomplete ankylosis and 25 complete ankylosis. Intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of all six methods were generally high. The ICCs were all ≥0.77 (excellent) for the six radiographic methods in the combined group. However, a comparison of the ICCs, 95 % confidence intervals and mean absolute difference (MAD) between groups with varying degrees of ankylosis showed that the reliability of the lordosis measurements decreased in proportion to the severity of ankylosis. The Cobb L1-S1, Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-S1 method demonstrated higher ICCs for both inter and intraobserver comparisons and the other methods showed lower ICCs in all groups. The intraobserver MAD was similar in the Cobb L1-S1 and Cobb L1-L5 (2.7°-4.3°), but the other methods showed higher intraobserver MAD. Interobserver MAD of Cobb L1-L5 only showed low in all group.These results are the first to provide a reliability analysis of different global lumbar lordosis measurement methods in AS. The findings in this study demonstrated that the Cobb L1-L5 method is reliable for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in AS.
机译:已经报道了几种测量腰椎前凸的方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。但是,尚未对强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的研究者进行研究。我们评估了AS患者中六种特定的整体腰椎前凸测量指标在观察者之间和观察者之间的可靠性。连续入选符合最新纽约标准的91例AS患者,并对其全脊柱进行前后位和侧位X光片检查。放射线照片分为非强直性(腰椎无骨桥),不完全强直(腰椎由骨桥部分连接)和完全强直组,以评估Cobb L1-S1,Cobb L1-L5,质心,后切线L1-S1,后切线L1-L5和TRALL方法.X射线照片由39个非强直,27个不完全强直和25个完全强直组成。所有六种方法的类内和类间相关系数(ICC)通常都很高。合并组的六种射线照相方法的ICC均≥0.77(优异)。但是,对不同程度的强直的两组之间的ICC,95%置信区间和平均绝对差(MAD)的比较显示,前凸测量的可靠性与强直的严重程度成正比。 Cobb L1-S1,Cobb L1-L5和后切线L1-S1方法在观察者之间和观察者之间的比较中均显示出较高的ICC,而其他方法在所有组中均显示出较低的ICC。 Cobb L1-S1和Cobb L1-L5(2.7°-4.3°)的观察者内MAD相似,但是其他方法显示的观察者内MAD更高。 Cobb L1-L5的观察者MAD仅在所有组中显示较低,这些结果是首次提供了对AS中不同全球腰椎前凸测量方法的可靠性分析。这项研究的结果表明,Cobb L1-L5方法可用于测量AS的整体腰椎前凸。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号