首页> 外文期刊>European neuropsychopharmacology: the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology >Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of candidate treatments for cognitive impairment in depression and methodological challenges in the field
【24h】

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of candidate treatments for cognitive impairment in depression and methodological challenges in the field

机译:系统评价抑郁症认知障碍和方法学挑战的候选疗法的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) but treatments targeting cognition are lacking. Numerous pre-clinical and clinical studies have investigated potential cognition treatments, but overall the evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic search following the PRISMA guidelines on PubMed and Psychlnfo to evaluate the extant evidence and methodological challenges in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biological, psychological and behavioural candidate treatments targeting cognition in MDD. Inclusion criteria were RCTs with a placebo control assessing potential pro-cognitive effects of candidate treatments in MDD. Two independent authors reviewed the studies and assessed their risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-eight eligible studies (24 biological and four psychological or behavioural studies) were identified. Cognition was the primary treatment target in ten (36%) trials and an additional treatment outcome together with mood symptoms in 18 (64%) trials. The risk of bias was high or unclear in 93% of trials due to potential selective outcome reporting or 'pseudospecificity' (unspecific cognitive improvement due to reduced depression severity), and/or insufficient details on how the allocation sequence was generated or how blinding was maintained. Several promising treatments were identified, including vortioxetine, erythropoietin, transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive remediation. However, several common methodological challenges may impede advances in the field. In particular, future trials should select one cognitive composite score as primary outcome, screen for cognitive impairment before inclusion of participants and address 'pseudospecificity' issues. Together, these strategies may improve the success of future cognition trials in MDD. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
机译:认知障碍是重度抑郁症(MDD)的核心特征,但缺乏针对认知的治疗方法。许多临床前和临床研究已经研究了潜在的认知治疗方法,但总体而言,证据是矛盾的。我们按照PRISMA关于PubMed和Psychlnfo的指南进行了系统的搜索,以评估针对MDD认知的生物学,心理和行为候选治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)中的现有证据和方法挑战。纳入标准为带有安慰剂对照的RCT,用于评估MDD中候选疗法的潜在认知作用。两位独立作者回顾了研究,并使用Cochrane协作组织的“偏见风险”工具评估了偏见风险。确定了28项合格研究(24项生物学研究和4项心理或行为研究)。认知是十个试验(36%)的主要治疗目标,另外18个试验(64%)的试验结果是伴有情绪症状。在93%的试验中,由于潜在的选择性结果报告或“伪特异性”(由于抑郁症严重程度降低而引起的非特异性认知改善)和/或关于如何产生分配序列或如何致盲的细节不足,偏倚风险很高或不清楚保持。确定了几种有希望的治疗方法,包括伏替西汀,促红细胞生成素,经颅直流电刺激和认知修复。但是,一些常见的方法挑战可能会阻碍该领域的进步。特别是,未来的试验应选择一项认知综合评分作为主要结果,在纳入参与者之前筛查认知障碍,并解决“伪特异性”问题。这些策略一起可以提高MDD未来认知试验的成功率。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.和ECNP。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号