首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration
【24h】

The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration

机译:捕食者学习,遗忘和识别错误对警告色演变的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper demonstrates that the specifics of predator avoidance learning, information loss, and recognition errors may heavily influence the evolution of aposematism. I establish a mathematical model of the change in frequency over time of bright individuals of a distasteful prey species. Warning color spreads through green beard selection as reformulated by Guilford (1990); bright colored forms gain an advantage due to their phenotypic resemblance to other bright forms, which have been sampled by the predator. I use a general classical conditioning model to examine gradual predator learning and forgetting, and then consider the extreme of one-trial learning and no forgetting over time that may occur with very toxic prey. The advantage of conspicuous coloration under these latter conditions depends upon its role in lowering a constant probability of the prey being misidentified and thus mistakenly attacked by a predator, a rarely emphasized factor in the evolution of warning coloration. This constant probability of mistaken attacks can also be interpreted as a constant probability that forgetting has occurred (forgetting does not increase with time) or a periodic decision by the predator to resample avoided prey. I show that when predators learn and forget gradually, as under the general classical conditioning model it is very difficult for aposematic coloration to become established unless bright individuals cross an often high threshold frequency through chance factors. In contrast, the conditions expected with highly toxic prey promote the evolution of warning coloration more easily, by means from the fixation of very bright mutations to the fixation of successive mutations each of which causes a small increase in a prey's conspicuousness. The results therefore predict that aposematic coloration may have evolved in a different manner in different predator and prey systems. They also suggest that it may be extremely difficult for warning coloration to evolve in more mildly toxic or distasteful prey outside of a mimicry system. [References: 80]
机译:本文表明,捕食者回避学习,信息丢失和识别错误的细节可能会严重影响养蜂的发展。我建立了一个令人讨厌的猎物明亮的个体的频率随时间变化的数学模型。吉尔福德(1990)重新制定了警告颜色,通过选择绿色胡须传播。亮色形式的表型与捕食者采样的其他亮形式相似,因此具有优势。我使用一般的经典条件模型来研究渐进式捕食者的学习和遗忘,然后考虑一次尝试性学习的极端性,并且随着时间的流逝,不会遗忘具有剧毒的猎物。在后一种情况下,明显着色的优势取决于其在降低不断被误识别并因此被掠食者错误攻击的可能性方面的作用,而掠食者是警告着色演变中很少强调的因素。错误攻击的这种恒定概率也可以解释为发生遗忘的恒定概率(遗忘不会随时间增加)或捕食者做出的定期决策以重新采样避免的猎物。我表明,当掠食者逐渐学习并忘记时,就像在一般的经典条件模型下一样,除非有聪明的人通过偶然因素越过通常较高的阈值频率,否则很难形成无定色。相比之下,具有剧毒的猎物所期望的条件,通过固定非常明亮的突变到固定连续的突变,都更容易促进警告色的演变,每个突变都会导致猎物的显眼性小幅增加。因此,结果预测,在不同的捕食者和猎物系统中,无意识着色可能以不同的方式演变。他们还建议,警告色在模仿系统之外演化为毒性较小或令人反感的猎物可能非常困难。 [参考:80]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号