首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Modeling costs for prostate surgery: Are we close to reality?
【24h】

Modeling costs for prostate surgery: Are we close to reality?

机译:前列腺手术的建模成本:我们接近现实了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a demand for analysis of the cost effectiveness of new surgical technologies. The total societal costs of prostate cancer (PCa) surgery have increased markedly due to the rising incidence of men contracting PCa combined with the implementation of new surgical techniques. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been introduced as a new approach in patients with localized PCa. The procedural costs for RARP are probably higher than for open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) and possibly also for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). The reasons behind the rapid implementation of RARP are probably multifactorial (eg, intense marketing to surgeons, hospitals, and patients), but without large-scale controlled trials in support of the new technique, this development is still surprising. Certain advantages have been suggested for RARP compared with LRP, such as a shorter learning curve, three-dimensional vision, and better ergonometry, but we do not know if these advantages translate to patient benefits. Moreover, the disadvantages, including no haptic feedback, may shadow advantages. Consequently, the need to study cost effectiveness is urgent.
机译:需要分析新外科技术的成本效益。前列腺癌(PCa)手术的总社会成本显着增加,这是由于男性感染PCa的发生率上升以及新手术技术的实施所致。机器人辅助的腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RARP)已被引入为局部PCa患者的一种新方法。 RARP的手术费用可能比耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)高,腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)也可能更高。快速实施RARP的原因可能是多方面的(例如,向外科医生,医院和患者进行大量营销),但是如果没有大规模的对照试验来支持新技术,这种发展仍然令人惊讶。与LRP相比,RARP具有某些优势,例如学习曲线更短,三维视觉和更好的人体测量学,但我们不知道这些优势是否会为患者带来益处。而且,包括没有触觉反馈的缺点可能会掩盖优点。因此,迫切需要研究成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号