首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

机译:耻骨后和腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术并发症的综合标准化报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The lack of standardized reporting of the complications of radical prostatectomy in the literature has made it difficult to compare incidences across institutions and across different surgical approaches. OBJECTIVE: To define comprehensively the incidence, severity, and timing of onset of medical and surgical complications of open retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LP) using a standardized reporting methodology to facilitate comparison. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1999 and June 2007, 4592 consecutive patients underwent RP or LP without prior radiation or hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 36.9 mo (interquartile range: 20.3-60.6). INTERVENTION: Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MEASUREMENTS: All medical and surgical complications of radical prostatectomy were captured and graded according to the modified Clavien classification and classified by timing of onset. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 612 medical complications in 467 patients (10.2%) and 1426 surgical complications in 925 patients (20.1%). The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for RP were 8.5% and 1.5% for medical and 11.4% and 4.9% for surgical complications, respectively. The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for LP were 14.2% and 2.3% for medical and 23.1% and 6.6% for surgical complications, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LP approach was associated with a higher incidence of any grade medical and surgical complications but a lower incidence of major surgical complications than RP. Six hundred fifty-two men (14.2%) visited the emergency department, and 240 men (5.2%) required readmission. The main limitation is the retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: With standardized reporting, the incidence of some complications is higher than recognized in the literature. Although most complications are minor in severity, medical and surgical complications are observed in approximately 10% and 20% of patients, respectively. Accurate reporting of complications through a standardized methodology is essential for counseling patients regarding risk of complications, for identifying modifiable risk factors, and for facilitating comparison across institutions and approaches.
机译:背景:文献中缺乏对前列腺癌根治术并发症的标准化报告,这使得很难比较不同机构和不同手术方法的发生率。目的:使用标准化的报告方法,以方便比较,全面定义开放性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RP)和腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(LP)的内科和外科并发症的发生率,严重程度和发作时间。设计,地点和参加者:在1999年1月至2007年6月之间,连续4592例患者接受了RP或LP治疗,而没有事先接受放射或激素治疗。中位随访时间为36.9 mo(四分位间距:20.3-60.6)。干预:开放式或腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术。测量:根治性前列腺切除术的所有医学和外科手术并发症均根据改良的Clavien分类法进行分类,并按发病时机进行分类。结果与局限性:467例患者中有612例医疗并发症(10.2%),925例患者中有1426例手术并发症(20.1%)。 RP的早期轻微和主要内科及外科并发症的总发生率分别为内科并发症为8.5%和1.5%,外科并发症为11.4%和4.9%。 LP的早期轻微和主要内科及外科并发症的总发生率分别为内科并发症为14.2%和2.3%,外科并发症为23.1%和6.6%。在多变量分析中,与RP相比,LP方法与任何级别的医疗和手术并发症的发生率均较高,但主要手术并发症的发生率较低。紧急医疗人员有542人(14.2%)进入急诊科,而有240人(5.2%)需重新入院。主要限制是追溯性质。结论:采用标准化报告,某些并发症的发生率高于文献中公认的水平。尽管大多数并发症的严重程度较小,但分别在约10%和20%的患者中观察到内科和外科并发症。通过标准化的方法准确报告并发症对于咨询患者并发症风险,确定可修改的风险因素以及促进机构和方法之间的比较至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号