首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Editorial comment on: a comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy.
【24h】

Editorial comment on: a comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy.

机译:编辑评论:开放式和机器人膀胱切除术术后并发症的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The surgeon in this series is to be congratulated on his skills, both in open and robotic surgery [1], However, single-surgeon series involving two or more competing techniques always raise the question of whether the surgeon has more experience with or a preference for a certain technique. Since this series is not a randomized study, the preference for or comfort with open or robotic surgery may lead to a selection bias (for both urologists and patients) that cannot be excluded simply by the factors listed under patient demographics in Table 2. Such a bias can derive, for example, from the fact that well-suited patients are referred to the institution because of the excellent results in robotic surgery, whereas those patients undergoing open cystectomy were more difficult cases that the referring or operating urologists did not think were ideal.
机译:该系列中的外科医生应赞扬他在开放式和机器人手术中的技能[1],但是,涉及两个或多个竞争技术的单人外科医生系列总是会引起以下问题:外科医生是否有更多的经验或偏好对于某种技术。由于该系列研究不是随机研究,因此对开放式或机器人式手术的偏爱或舒适感可能导致选择偏倚(对于泌尿科医师和患者),不能仅通过表2中患者人口统计信息中列出的因素来排除。例如,由于机器人手术的出色结果而将合适的患者转诊给机构,会产生偏见,而那些接受开腹膀胱切除术的患者则是更困难的情况,转诊或手术泌尿科医生并不认为这是理想的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号