首页> 外文期刊>European urology >The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.
【24h】

The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.

机译:腹腔镜和机器人膀胱切除术在管理肌肉浸润性膀胱癌中的作用,尤其着重于癌症的控制和并发症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) techniques for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) are being increasingly applied. MIRC offers the potential benefits of a minimally invasive approach in terms of reduced blood loss and analgesic requirements whilst striving to provide similar oncologic efficacy to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Whether quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in complications are routinely achieved with MIRC remains to be proved in prospective comparisons. OBJECTIVE: To explore both laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RRC), focusing specifically on the oncologic parameters and comorbidity of the procedures. Reported complications from major centres are identified and categorised via the Clavien system. Positive margins rates, local recurrence, and both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival rates are assessed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in November 2010 using the Medline database to identify publications relating to laparoscopic, robotic, or minimally invasive radical cystectomy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There are encouraging short- to medium-term results for both LRC and RRC in terms of postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes. It seems possible in experienced hands to perform a satisfactory minimally invasive lymphadenectomy regarding lymph node counts and levels of dissection. Positive soft-tissue margins are similar to large open series for T2/T3 disease but inferior for bulky T4 disease. Local recurrence rates and CSS rates seem equivalent to ORC at up to 3 yr of follow-up; however, mature outcome data still need to be presented before definitive comparisons can be made. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic cystectomy has a growing role in the management of muscle-invasive BCa. Long-term oncologic results are awaited, and there are concerns over the ability of MIRC to treat bulky and locally advanced disease, making careful patient selection vital. Forthcoming randomised trials in this area will more fully address these issues.
机译:背景:微创根治性膀胱切除术(MIRC)技术用于治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(BCa)。 MIRC在降低失血量和止痛要求的同时,还提供了微创方法的潜在优势,同时努力提供与开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)类似的肿瘤学疗效。使用MIRC是否能常规恢复更快,住院时间更短,并发症减少,尚待前瞻性比较证实。目的:探讨腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RRC),特别关注手术的肿瘤学参数和合并症。通过Clavien系统识别并分类了主要中心报告的并发症。对阳性利润率,局部复发率以及癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率进行了评估。证据获取:2010年11月,使用Medline数据库进行了全面的电子文献搜索,以识别与腹腔镜,机器人或微创根治性膀胱切除术相关的出版物。证据综合:就术后发病率和肿瘤学结局而言,LRC和RRC的短期至中期结果令人鼓舞。关于有经验的人,就淋巴结计数和解剖水平而言,似乎有可能进行令人满意的微创淋巴结清扫术。阳性软组织切缘与T2 / T3疾病的大开放序列相似,但对笨重的T4疾病次要。在长达3年的随访中,局部复发率和CSS率似乎与ORC相当;但是,在进行确定的比较之前,仍需要提供成熟的结果数据。结论:机器人和腹腔镜膀胱切除术在管理肌肉浸润性BCa方面起着越来越重要的作用。等待长期的肿瘤学结果,并且人们担心MIRC治疗大块和局部晚期疾病的能力,使得谨慎选择患者至关重要。即将在该领域进行的随机试验将更全面地解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号