...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of epidemiology >Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk.
【24h】

Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk.

机译:与登记册关联的人口调查中的选择偏见:对心血管风险中社会经济梯度的潜在影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Non-participation in population studies is likely to be a source of bias in many types of epidemiologic studies, including those describing social disparities in health. The objective of this paper is to present a non-attendance analysis evaluating the possible impact of selection bias, when investigating the association between education level and cardiovascular risk factors. Data from the INTERGENE research programme including 3,610 randomly selected individuals aged 25-74 (1,908 women and 1,702 men), in West Sweden were used. Only 42% of the invited population participated. Non-attendance analyses were done by comparing data from official registries (Statistics Sweden) covering the entire invited study population. This analysis revealed that participants were more likely to be women, have university education, high income, be married and of Nordic origin compared to non-participants. Among participants, all health behaviours studied were significantly related to education. Physical activity, alcohol use and breakfast consumption were higher in the more educated group, while there were more smokers in the less educated group. Central obesity, obesity and hypertension were also significantly associated with lower education level. Weaker associations were observed for blood lipids, diabetes, high plasma glucose level and perceived stress. The socio-demographic differences between participants and non-participants indicated by the register analysis imply potential biases in epidemiological research. For instance, the positive association between education level and frequent alcohol consumption, may, in part be explained by participation bias. For other risk factors studied, an underestimation of the importance of low socioeconomic status may be more likely.
机译:不参加人口研究可能是许多类型的流行病学研究(包括描述健康方面社会差异的研究)产生偏见的原因。本文的目的是在调查教育水平与心血管危险因素之间的关联时,提出一种非出勤分析,以评估选择偏见的可能影响。使用来自INTERGENE研究计划的数据,包括西瑞典的3,610位年龄在25-74岁之间的随机选择的个体(1,908名女性和1,702名男性)。受邀人口中只有42%参加了。通过比较来自官方注册机构(瑞典统计局)的数据(涵盖整个受邀研究人群)进行非出勤分析。该分析表明,与未参加者相比,参加者更有可能是女性,大学学历,高收入,已婚并具有北欧血统。在参与者中,所有研究的健康行为均与教育密切相关。受过良好教育的组的体育锻炼,饮酒和早餐消费量较高,而受教育程度较低的组则有更多的吸烟者。中枢型肥胖,肥胖和高血压也与低学历有显着相关。观察到血脂,糖尿病,高血浆葡萄糖水平和感觉到的压力较弱的关联。登记册分析表明,参与者与非参与者之间的社会人口统计学差异暗示了流行病学研究中的潜在偏见。例如,教育水平和频繁饮酒之间的正相关可以部分由参与偏差来解释。对于研究的其他风险因素,可能更容易低估低社会经济地位的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号