...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of internal medicine >Involuntary weight loss. Does a negative baseline evaluation provide adequate reassurance?
【24h】

Involuntary weight loss. Does a negative baseline evaluation provide adequate reassurance?

机译:非自愿减肥。基线评估阴性是否可以提供足够的保证?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Involuntary weight loss frequently poses a diagnostic challenge. Patient and physician alike want to exclude malignant and other major organic illness. The present study aimed to evaluate whether a negative baseline evaluation (consisting of clinical examination, standard laboratory examination, chest X-ray, and abdominal ultrasound) lowers the probability of evolving organic illness in patients with significant unexplained weight loss. METHODS: Prospective observational study of 101 consecutive patients presenting to a general internal medicine department of a university hospital with an unexplained unintentional weight loss of at least 5% within 6-12 months. Laboratory tests of interest included C-reactive protein, albumin, haemoglobin, and liver function tests. RESULTS: Weight loss of the 101 patients [age (mean, interquartile range): 64 (51-71) years, 46% male] averaged 10 (7-15) kg. Organic causes were found in 57 patients (56%), including malignancy in 22 (22%). In 44 patients withoutobvious organic cause for the weight loss (44%), a psychiatric disorder was implicated in 16 (16%) and no cause was established in 28 (28%), despite vigorous effort and follow-up of at least 6 months. Baseline evaluation was entirely normal in none of the 22 patients (0%) with malignancy, in 2 of the 35 (5.7%) with non-malignant organic disease, and in 23 of the 44 (52%) without physical diagnosis. Additional testing, oftentimes extensive, after a normal baseline evaluation led to one additional physical diagnosis (lactose intolerance). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with substantial unintentional weight loss, major organic and especially malignant diseases seem highly unlikely when a baseline evaluation is completely normal. In this setting, a watchful waiting approach may be preferable to undirected and invasive testing.
机译:背景:非自愿减肥经常带来诊断挑战。病人和医生都希望排除恶性和其他主要器质性疾病。本研究旨在评估阴性基线评估(由临床检查,标准实验室检查,胸部X线检查和腹部超声检查所组成)是否能降低体重无法解释的严重患者发生器质性疾病的可能性。方法:前瞻性观察性研究对101名连续患者进行了观察,这些患者在6到12个月内出现在大学医院内科普通科中,原因不明的无意识体重减轻了至少5%。感兴趣的实验室检查包括C反应蛋白,白蛋白,血红蛋白和肝功能检查。结果:101名患者的体重减轻[年龄(平均,四分位间距):64(51-71)岁,男性占46%]平均减轻10(7-15)kg。器质性原因发现57例(56%),包括22例恶性肿瘤(22%)。尽管付出了巨大的努力并进行了至少6个月的随访,但在没有明显的器质性体重减轻原因的44例患者中(44%),有16例(16%)患有精神疾病,而28例(28%)尚无原因。 。 22例恶性肿瘤患者(0%),35例非恶性器质性疾病患者中的2例,未进行物理诊断的23例(52%)中的基线评估均完全正常。在正常的基线评估后,通常需要进行额外的测试,才能进行另一项物理诊断(乳糖不耐症)。结论:在无意间出现重大体重减轻的患者中,当基线评估完全正常时,重大器质性疾病尤其是恶性疾病的可能性很小。在这种情况下,警惕的等待方法可能比无方向性和侵入性测试更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号