...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:自发性气胸的经皮穿刺抽吸与管腔引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Spontaneous pneumothorax is an extremely frequent pathology. Despite this, there is still no clear consensus on managing these patients. Therefore, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration compared with tube drainage for treating idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax. Controlled, randomised clinical trials were selected, in which the effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration is compared with that of chest tube drainage, in terms of resolution of the pneumothorax and rates of relapse and hospital admission. Relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, mRCT and Pascal), as well as the references of the papers found in this manner, with a cut-off date of April 2009. Quality was assessed by two independent evaluators, using the CASPe appraisal tool. Effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration is compared with that of chest tube drainage, in terms of resolution of the pneumothorax and rates of relapse and hospital admission.
机译:自发性气胸是一种极为常见的病理。尽管如此,在治疗这些患者方面仍未达成明确共识。因此,我们对经皮穿刺抽吸与输尿管引流治疗特发性自发性气胸的效果进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析。选择了对照的随机临床试验,从气胸的分辨率,复发率和住院率方面比较了经皮穿刺抽吸与胸腔引流的有效性。通过搜索电子数据库(例如Medline,EMBASE,CENTRAL,mRCT和Pascal)以及以这种方式发现的论文参考文献,可以识别出相关文章,截止日期为2009年4月。质量通过两次评估独立评估师,使用CASPe评估工具。在确定气胸,复发率和住院率方面,将经皮穿刺抽吸的效果与胸腔引流的效果进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号