...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Combined videothoracoscopic and videomediastinoscopic approach improves radicality of minimally invasive mediastinal lymphadenectomy for early stage lung carcinoma.
【24h】

Combined videothoracoscopic and videomediastinoscopic approach improves radicality of minimally invasive mediastinal lymphadenectomy for early stage lung carcinoma.

机译:电视胸腔镜和电视纵隔镜联合方法可改善早期肺癌微创纵隔淋巴结清扫术的根治性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and radicality of a combined thoracoscopic and mediastinoscopic approach to mediastinal lymphadenectomy compared to thoracoscopy only for minimally invasive management of early stage lung carcinoma. METHODS: Prospective observational study of patients undergoing anatomical thoracoscopic lung resection for lung carcinoma in our department in 2007. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed either thoracoscopically (VATS group) or by a combination of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) and thoracoscopy (VAMLA+VATS group). Inclusion criteria for the study were: stage Ia on CT scan, no central tumor at bronchoscopy, and no contraindications against lobectomy or segmentectomy. RESULTS: Eighteen VAMLA+VATS and fourteen VATS patients were studied. For histology, pTNM stage, type of resection, semiquantitative assessment of the fissure and vascular dissection plane, conversions, blood loss, operation time, adverse events and drainage time, no differencesbetween the two groups were observed. In the VATS group, there was a slight preponderance of women, and right-sided tumors. In the VAMLA+VATS group, both the number of dissected mediastinal lymph node stations (mean, 6.4 stations vs 3.6 stations) and the weight of the mediastinal specimen (median, 11.2 groups vs 5.5 groups), were significantly higher than in the VATS group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach by VATS and VAMLA improves radicality of minimally invasive mediastinal lymphadenectomy without increase in operation time, morbidity, and drainage time.
机译:目的:评估胸腔镜和纵隔镜联合淋巴结清扫术与胸腔镜相比仅适用于早期肺癌的微创治疗的可行性和彻底性。方法:对2007年我科肺癌经胸腔镜解剖肺切除的患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。纵隔淋巴结清扫术是通过胸腔镜(VATS组)或电视辅助纵隔镜下淋巴结清扫术(VAMLA)和胸腔镜(VAMLA + VATS)联合进行的。组)。该研究的纳入标准为:CT扫描为Ia期,支气管镜检查无中央肿瘤,无肺叶切除术或节段切除术的禁忌证。结果:研究了18例VAMLA + VATS和14例VATS患者。在组织学,pTNM分期,切除类型,裂隙和血管解剖平面的半定量评估,转换,失血量,手术时间,不良事件和引流时间方面,两组之间无差异。在VATS组中,女性占少数,右侧为肿瘤。在VAMLA + VATS组中,纵隔淋巴结清扫的数目(平均6.4站vs 3.6站)和纵隔标本的重量(中位数11.2组vs 5.5组)均显着高于VATS组(p <0.05)。结论:VATS和VAMLA的组合方法可改善微创纵隔淋巴结清扫术的根治性,而不会增加手术时间,发病率和引流时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号