首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardiovascular nursing: journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology >Immediate mobilization after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the AngioSeal vascular closure device (the MOBS study)
【24h】

Immediate mobilization after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the AngioSeal vascular closure device (the MOBS study)

机译:使用AngioSeal血管闭合装置进行止血后,在冠状动脉造影后立即动员或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MOBS研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the standard post procedure regime includes immobilization and bed rest despite the use of vascular closure devices.Aim: In the Mobilization after Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (MOBS) study we compared bleeding complications after cardiac catheterization with femoral artery access after mobilization immediately off the angiographic table or standard care with1 hour (MOBS I after a diagnostic angiogram) or 2 hours of bed rest before mobilization (MOBS II after PCI).Methods: Bleeding complications were defined as major (requiring surgery of the femoral artery, transfusion or increased hospital stay) and minor (hematoma 5×5 cm2, oozing from the puncture site or minor bleeding that could be compressed manually).Results: In the MOBS I cohort (100 patients were mobilized immediately and 100 patients followed standard care) no major bleeding complications were seen. In the immediate mobilization group 2.0% experienced minor bleeding compared to 4.0% in the standard care group (p=0.41). In the MOBS II cohort after PCI (158 patients were mobilized immediately and 161 patients followed standard care), major bleeding complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups: immediate mobilization group 26.6% vs. standard care group 28.0%, p=0.78. The majority of bleeding complications were due to oozing: immediate mobilization group 22.8% vs. standard care group 20.5%, p=0.62.Conclusions: Immediate mobilization after a coronary angiogram or PCI with the femoral access site closed by the closure device AngioSeal was not associated with increased bleeding risk compared to standard care with bed rest.
机译:背景:在接受冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,尽管使用了血管闭合装置,标准的术后程序仍包括固定和卧床休息。目的:在冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MOBS)后的动员中将心脏导管插入术后的出血并发症与动员后立即离开血管造影台的股动脉或标准护理在动静前1小时(诊断性血管造影后为MOBS I)或动员前卧床休息2小时(PCI后为MOBS II)进行比较。定义为大手术(需要股动脉手术,输血或增加住院时间)和小手术(血肿5×5 cm2,从穿刺部位渗出或可以手动压迫的小出血)结果:在MOBS I队列中(100患者立即动员起来,并接受了100位患者的标准护理)未见大出血并发症。在立即动员组中,有2.0%的人发生了轻微出血,而在标准护理组中,只有4.0%的人发生了大出血(p = 0.41)。在PCI后的MOBS II队列中(158例立即动员,161例接受标准治疗),两组的主要出血并发症发生率无显着差异:即刻动员组26.6%,而标准治疗组28.0%,p = 0.78 。大多数出血并发症是由于渗血引起的:立即动员组为22.8%,而标准护理组为20.5%,p = 0.62。结论:在没有通过闭合装置AngioSeal封闭股动脉的冠状动脉造影或PCI后立即动员与常规卧床护理相比,出血风险增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号