...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for imaging upper extremity vasculature prior to vascular access creation
【24h】

Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for imaging upper extremity vasculature prior to vascular access creation

机译:非造影磁共振血管造影在创建血管通路之前对上肢血管成像的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Preoperative mapping of arterial and venous anatomy helps to prevent postoperative complications after vascular access creation. The use of gadolinium in contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been linked to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) MRA for assessment of upper extremity and central vasculature and to compare it with CE-MRA. Methods: NCE and CE-MRA images were acquired in 10 healthy volunteers and 15 patients with ESRD. In each data set, two observers analysed 11 arterial and 16 venous segments with regard to image quality (0-4), presence of artefacts (0-2) and vessel-to-background ratio. Results: More arterial segments were depicted using CE-MRA compared to NCE-MRA (99% vs. 96%, p = 0.001) with mean image quality of 3.80 vs. 2.68, (p < 0.001) and mean vessel-to-background ratio of 6.47 vs. 4.14 (p < 0.001). Ninety-one percent of the venous segments were portrayed using NCE-MRA vs. 80% using CE-MRA (p < 0.001). Mean image quality and vessel-to-background ratio were 2.41 vs. 2.21 (p = 0.140) and 5.13 vs. 3.88 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Although arterial image quality and vessel-to-background ratios were lower, NCE-MRA is considered a feasible alternative to CE-MRA in patients with ESRD who need imaging of the upper extremity and central vasculature prior to dialysis access creation.
机译:目的:术前绘制动脉和静脉的解剖图有助于预防血管通路形成后的术后并发症。 contrast增强造影(CE)磁共振血管造影(MRA)中使用use已与晚期肾病(ESRD)患者的肾源性全身纤维化有关。这项研究的目的是评估非造影剂(NCE)MRA,以评估上肢和中央脉管系统,并将其与CE-MRA进行比较。方法:在10名健康志愿者和15名ESRD患者中获得了NCE和CE-MRA图像。在每个数据集中,两名观察员分析了11个动脉段和16个静脉段的图像质量(0-4),伪影的存在(0-2)和血管与背景的比率。结果:与NCE-MRA相比,使用CE-MRA描绘了更多的动脉节段(99%比96%,p = 0.001),平均图像质量为3.80 vs. 2.68,(p <0.001),平均血管到背景比为6.47和4.14(p <0.001)。使用NCE-MRA描绘了91%的静脉段,而使用CE-MRA描绘了80%(p <0.001)。平均图像质量和血管与背景之比分别为2.41对2.21(p = 0.140)和5.13对3.88(p <0.001)。结论:尽管动脉影像质量和血管与背景的比率较低,但对于需要在创建透析通路之前需要对上肢和中央脉管成像的ESRD患者,NCE-MRA被认为是CE-MRA的可行替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号