首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation
【24h】

Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation

机译:与欧洲栓塞后肝细胞癌肝标准研究协会修订的实体瘤改良应答评价标准的预后价值进行前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Backgrounds: European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) guidelines, which measure changes in arterialised hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), differ in terms of number of target lesions (all versus ??2) and calculation method (bidimensional versus unidimensional). We compared prognostic values of mRECIST for predicting overall survival (OS) with reference to EASL criteria in treatment-na?ve HCC undergoing trans-arterial chemoembolisation (TACE). Methods: The ability to predict OS during longitudinal follow-up was expressed as C-index, and a sample size of 292 patients was required to validate its equivalence between each criteria. Treatment responses were assessed using both guidelines 4 weeks after the first TACE, using dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to explore differences in OS between responders (complete or partial) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease), defined by each method. Results: C-index for EASL and mRECIST guidelines was 0.753 and 0.759, respectively, demonstrating equivalence between two methods. Differences in median OS between responders and non-responders were statistically significant for both EASL (30.1 versus 18.7 months, p < 0.001) and mRECIST (33.8 versus 17.1 months, p < 0.001) guidelines. In addition to radiological response, ??-fetoprotein (p < 0.001), tumour number (p < 0.001) and tumour size (p = 0.048) were significant predictors of OS. In multivariate analysis, radiological criteria, tumour number and ??-fetoprotein were identified as independent predictors (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: mRECIST, a simpler method, provided prognostic values for predicting OS equivalent to EASL criteria in patients with HCC undergoing TACE as an initial treatment modality. ? 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:欧洲肝病研究协会(EASL)和修改后的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)指南(用于测量动脉性肝细胞癌(HCC)的变化)在靶标病变的数量方面有所不同(全部还是全部) 2)和计算方法(二维与一维)。我们比较了在接受过动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的未经治疗的HCC中EASL标准下,mRECIST预测总体生存(OS)的预后价值。方法:将纵向随访过程中预测OS的能力表示为C指数,需要292名患者的样本量来验证各标准之间的等效性。首次TACE后4周,根据两种指南评估治疗反应,采用动态计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析来探讨每种方法定义的反应者(完全或部分)和非反应者(稳定或进行性疾病)之间的OS差异。结果:EASL和mRECIST指南的C指数分别为0.753和0.759,表明两种方法之间的等效性。对于EASL(30.1比18.7个月,p <0.001)和mRECIST(33.8比17.1个月,p <0.001)指南,有反应者和无反应者之间的中位OS差异具有统计学意义。除放射学反应外,β-甲胎蛋白(p <0.001),肿瘤数目(p <0.001)和肿瘤大小(p = 0.048)是OS的重要预测指标。在多变量分析中,放射学标准,肿瘤数目和??甲胎蛋白被确定为独立的预测因子(所有p <0.05)。结论:mRECIST是一种更简单的方法,可为TACE作为初始治疗方式的HCC患者提供相当于EASL标准的OS预测预后价值。 ? 2012 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号