首页> 外文期刊>European journal of trauma: official publication of the European Trauma Society >Functional Outcome Following Fixed-Angle Volar Plating or Intrafocal K-Wire Fixation for Extraarticular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius:A Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Outcomes
【24h】

Functional Outcome Following Fixed-Angle Volar Plating or Intrafocal K-Wire Fixation for Extraarticular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius:A Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

机译:Fixed骨远端部分关节外骨折固定角度掌侧钢板或焦内K-线固定后的功能结果:治疗结果的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the results of two operative techniques used for the treatment of distal radius fractures classified as AO type AS.Patients were treated with either fixed-angle volar plates or intrafocal Kirschner wires (K-wires) using a Kapandji-like technique.The functional results were determined with the Gartland & Werley Score as well as the DASH Score after an average follow-up of 28 months.55 patients were included in the study. Of these, 33 were female and 22 male, with an average age of 59 years. In patients < 60years, the Gartland Score was 1.4 points in the fixed-angle volar plate group, and 4.6 points in the Kapandji group. In patients >= 60 years, no significant difference between the therapy groups could be ascertained.The DASH Score measured 17 points in each group. In all cases, a satisfactory reduction was obtained.The Kapandji group experienced significantly more loss of reduction position at follow-up in terms of volar tilt and radioulnar inclination than the fixed-angle volar plate group.results show that intrafocal K-wire fixation in older patients is a suitable method to attain and hold sufficient bony reduction. However,younger patients achieve better radiologic and functional results when treated with open reduction using the 3.5-mm LCP fixed-angle volar plate.
机译:这项回顾性研究的目的是比较两种用于治疗radius骨远端骨折的手术技术,将其归类为AO型AS。采用固定角掌钢板或焦内克氏针(K线)对患者进行治疗。在平均随访28个月后,通过Gartland&Werley评分和DASH评分确定功能结果,包括55名患者。其中,女性33例,男性22例,平均年龄59岁。在60岁以下的患者中,固定角掌侧钢板组的Gartland评分为1.4分,而Kapandji组的Gartland评分为4.6分。在> = 60岁的患者中,各治疗组之间无明显差异.DASH评分每组17分。在所有情况下,均获得满意的复位效果.Kapandji组在掌侧倾斜和尺尺偏角方面的随访中复位位置的损失明显大于固定角掌侧钢板组。老年患者是获得并保持足够的骨量减少的合适方法。但是,当使用3.5 mm LCP固定角掌侧钢板进行切开复位治疗时,年轻的患者可以获得更好的放射学和功能结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号