首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Management of acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: A systematic review of recent studies
【24h】

Management of acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: A systematic review of recent studies

机译:急诊科急性心房颤动的治疗:近期研究的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to provide an overview on the current evidence on the method of cardioversion in patients presenting with recent-onset atrial fibrillation at the emergency department. ISI Web of Science and MEDLINE were explored for articles published between January 2000 and December 2011 in English or Spanish for the keywords 'acute', 'recent-onset' or 'paroxysmal' AND 'atrial fibrillation' AND 'treatment' AND 'emergency'. Original published articles were included if they enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation episodes of short duration (<48 h) and if they specifically addressed time to conversion, length of stay in the emergency department, safety, and/or relapses. Data extracted included the number of patients included, agent(s) studied, type and level of evidence of the article, rate of sinus rhythm conversion, time to conversion, discharge rate, length of stay, adverse events, embolic complications, and relapses. Fourteen papers were included in the review, eight of them prospective and randomized. Cardioversion in the emergency department had an overall high rate of conversion and few side-effects and/or embolic complications. Direct current cardioversion was the most effective therapeutic strategy in terms of sinus rhythm restoration, rate of discharge, length of stay, and safety. Class I drugs were also effective in a selected population. Amiodarone had a longer conversion time, with a similar rate of acute adverse events. Cardioversion in the emergency department is feasible and safe. Direct current cardioversion is the most effective therapeutic strategy.
机译:该研究的目的是概述急诊科最近发生房颤的患者的复律方法的最新证据。对ISI Web of Science和MEDLINE进行了研究,以查找2000年1月至2011年12月之间以英语或西班牙语发表的文章,这些文章的关键词为“急性”,“近期发作”或“阵发性”,“房颤”,“治疗”和“紧急” 。如果他们招募了短期(<48 h)房颤发作的患者,并且他们特别解决了转化时间,在急诊室的住院时间,安全性和/或复发的问题,则包括原始发表的文章。提取的数据包括纳入的患者人数,研究的药物,文章的证据类型和水平,窦性心律转换率,转换时间,出院率,住院时间,不良事件,栓塞并发症和复发。该评价包括14篇论文,其中8篇是前瞻性和随机的。急诊科的心脏复律总体上具有较高的转化率,且副作用和/或栓塞并发症很少。就窦性心律恢复,出院率,住院时间和安全性而言,直流电复律是最有效的治疗策略。 I类药物在特定人群中也有效。胺碘酮的转化时间更长,急性不良事件发生率相似。在急诊科进行心脏复律是可行和安全的。直流电复律是最有效的治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号