...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Prospective application of risk scores in the interhospital transport of patients.
【24h】

Prospective application of risk scores in the interhospital transport of patients.

机译:风险评分在患者医院间运输中的前瞻性应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We carried out a prospective evaluation of 172 patients using our own risk score for patients transferred from the emergency department of a community hospital in Tudela, Spain, to main centres, during 1988. Although the data go back almost 10 years, this scoring has not been internationally published and is at present widely applied in Spain. Patients scoring less than 7 points were transferred under specialized nursing supervision (Group I), and those scoring equal to or over 7 points were transferred in a specially equipped intensive care unit surface ambulance and supervised by a physician and a nurse (Group II). There were 102 patients in Group I and 70 in Group II. Complications arising during transfer were defined as minor or serious. A low overall incidence of complications was recorded--a total of 29 cases (16.9% of all transfers). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in Group II patients (p < 0.005). One patient from Group II died during transport. All patients from Group II were admitted to the ICUs compared with only 20 (18.6%) from Group I (p < 0.001). Of a total of 23 deaths in hospital, nine were from Group I and 14 from Group II. During the first 24 hours after admission, six patients died from Group II and none from Group I. The application of risk scores has permitted to assign effectively technical and human resources for a safe interhospital transfer of critically ill patients.
机译:我们使用我们自己的风险评分,对1988年从西班牙图德拉市社区医院急诊科转移到主要中心的患者进行了172例患者的前瞻性评估。尽管该数据可以追溯到将近10年,但该评分并未已在国际上发布,目前在西班牙得到广泛应用。得分少于7分的患者在专业护理监督下转移(第一组),得分等于或超过7分的患者被转移到专门配备的重症监护室地面救护车中,并由医生和护士进行监督(第二组)。第一组为102例,第二组为70例。转移过程中出现的并发症定义为轻微或严重。记录的并发症总发生率很低-总共29例(占全部转移的16.9%)。 II组患者的并发症发生率明显更高(p <0.005)。第二组的一名患者在运输过程中死亡。 II组的所有患者均被纳入ICU,而I组中只有20例(18.6%)(p <0.001)。在医院总共23例死亡中,第一组9例,第二组14例。在入院后的最初24小时内,有6名患者死于第二组,无一人死于第一组。风险评分的应用已使有效的技术和人力资源得以分配,可用于危重病人的安全的医院间转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号