【24h】

Flow diagram or prose: does the format of practice guidelines matter?

机译:流程图或散文:实践指南的格式重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two formats (prose and flow diagram) of the guidelines for management of paracetamol poisoning, and to assess the likely performance without access to the guidelines. A prospective questionnaire study of the management of seven hypothetical cases of paracetamol ingestion was carried out by accident and emergency senior house officers at a regional induction course. No differences were found between the two formats. The proportion of correct answers was 37% in the flow diagram and 31% in the prose group (95% confidence interval for the difference -8% to 20%). In the group with neither format of the guideline the proportion of correct answers was lower: 19% (95% confidence interval for the difference between this group and the group with flow charts 6.9% to 30.6%, for the difference between this group and the group with the prose format 0.4% to 24.8%). The time taken to answer the questions did not vary between the groups. These data do not support the exclusive use of either format. They suggest that management of paracetamol poisoning is less likely to be correct if staff do not have access to the guidelines.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较对乙酰氨基酚中毒管理指南的两种格式(散文和流程图)的性能,并在未获得该指南的情况下评估可能的性能。事故和急诊高级房屋管理人员在地区入职培训中对7例假设的扑热息痛摄入管理进行了前瞻性问卷调查。两种格式之间没有发现差异。正确答案的比例在流程图中为37%,在散文组中为31%(95%的置信区间为-8%至20%的差异)。在没有两种指南格式的组中,正确答案的比例较低:19%(该组与流程图组之间的差异的置信区间为95%,对于该组与流程图之间的差异为6.9%至30.6%。组的散文格式为0.4%至24.8%)。两组之间回答问题所需的时间没有变化。这些数据不支持任何一种格式的排他性使用。他们认为,如果工作人员无法获得指南,对乙酰氨基酚中毒的管理就不太可能正确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利