...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of medical research. >Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonatal units--a survey of current preferences and practice in Germany.
【24h】

Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonatal units--a survey of current preferences and practice in Germany.

机译:在新生儿病房中使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)-对德国目前的偏好和习惯的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is only limited evidence regarding the equipment or the settings (pressure and flow) at which CPAP should be applied in neonatal care. Aims of this nationwide survey of German neonatal units were to investigate (1) for which clinical indications CPAP was employed, (2) which CPAP equipment was used, (3) which CPAP settings were applied. A questionnaire on the use of CPAP was sent to all children's hospitals in Germany. Data were stratified and compared by level of medical care provided (non-academic children's hospital, academic teaching hospital and university children's hospital). 274 institutions were contacted by mailed questionnaire. The response rate was 86%, 90 non-academic children's hospitals, 119 academic teaching hospitals and 26 university children's hospitals replied. (1) There were no statistically significant difference in CPAP use between the institutions: 231 (98%) used CPAP for treating respiratory distress syndrome, 225 (96%) for treating apnoea-bradycardia-syndrome and 230 (98%) following extubation. (2) Commercial CPAP systems were employed by 71% of units, the others used a combination of different devices. Respirator generated CPAP was most commonly used. Exclusively mononasal CPAP was used by only 9%, and binasal CPAP by 55% of institutions. (3) Median CPAP was 4.5 cm H2O (range 3-7), median maximum CPAP was 7 cm H2O (range 4-10), with no statistically significant differences between the hospitals. CONCLUSION: Between units, CPAP was given via a broad range of CPAP systems and at varying pressure settings. The reported differences reflects personal experiences and preferences, rather than sound evidence from clinical trials.
机译:关于在新生儿护理中应使用CPAP的设备或设置(压力和流量)的证据很少。这项对德国新生儿单位进行的全国性调查的目的是调查(1)使用CPAP的临床适应症,(2)使用CPAP的设备,(3)应用CPAP的设置。关于使用CPAP的调查表已发送到德国所有儿童医院。根据提供的医疗服务水平(非学术儿童医院,学术教学医院和大学儿童医院)对数据进行分层和比较。通过邮寄问卷与274个机构联系。答复率为86%,答复了90家非学术性儿童医院,119家学术教学医院和26家大学儿童医院。 (1)各机构之间使用CPAP的差异无统计学意义:231(98%)使用CPAP治疗呼吸窘迫综合征,225(96%)用于治疗呼吸暂停-心动过缓综合征和拔管后230(98%)。 (2)商业CPAP系统使用了71%的单元,其他使用了不同设备的组合。呼吸器产生的CPAP是最常用的。仅9%的人使用单鼻CPAP,55%的机构使用双鼻CPAP。 (3)CPAP的中位数为4.5 cm H2O(范围3-7),最大CPAP的中位数为7 cm H2O(范围4-10),各医院之间无统计学差异。结论:在单元之间,CPAP是通过广泛的CPAP系统和在不同的压力设置下给出的。报告的差异反映了个人的经验和偏好,而不是临床试验的可靠证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号