首页> 外文期刊>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience >Evidence-based definitions of bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders among 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes in the Bridge Study: Validity and comorbidity
【24h】

Evidence-based definitions of bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders among 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes in the Bridge Study: Validity and comorbidity

机译:桥梁研究中5,635例重度抑郁发作患者中双相I型和双相II型疾病的循证定义:有效性和合并症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The definitions of bipolar-I (BP-I) and bipolar-II (BP-II) disorders are currently under revision by the APA and by the WHO. We provide evidence of a revised set of criteria for bipolar disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD) which could serve to strengthen the construct and predictive validity of both disorders and enable more incisive studies of treatments and courses of both disorders. In the diagnostic Bridge Study of 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes from 18 countries (Europe, North Africa, Near East and Far East) leading psychiatrists in each country assessed a pre-specified group of symptoms, illness course, family history and duration of episodes; these data allowed tests of several definitions of bipolarity. The primary revised specifier diagnosis of BP-I disorder included manic episodes based on an additional category A criterion (increased activity/energy) and did not apply any exclusion criteria. The revised BP-II disorders included hypomanic episodes of 1-3 days. Family history and illness course validators (history of mania/hypomania among first degree relatives, 2 or more lifetime episodes and first symptoms having occurred before age 30) discriminated clearly between patients with bipolar-I or bipolar-II disorders meeting bipolarity specifier criteria and those with MDD. Specifier definitions provided better discrimination between MDD and the two bipolar subgroups. Patterns of concurrent comorbidities also differed significantly between patients meeting criteria for MDD compared with those meeting bipolar specifier criteria. Comorbidity patterns differed between bipolar-I and bipolar-II patients. This study provides evidence for the validity of modified (specifier) BP-I and BP-II definitions that incorporate illness course and family history which reduce ambiguities of major depressive episodes between bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders and MDD.
机译:APA和WHO目前正在修订双相性I型(BP-1)和双相性II(BP-II)的定义。我们提供了有关躁郁症和重度抑郁症(MDD)的一组修订标准的证据,这些标准可以用来加强两种疾病的构造和预测效度,并可以对两种疾病的治疗方法和疗程进行更深入的研究。在诊断性桥梁研究中,对来自18个国家(欧洲,北非,近东和远东)的5635名重度抑郁发作的患者进行了评估,每个国家的主要精神科医生评估了一组预先指定的症状,病程,家族病史和发作持续时间;这些数据允许对双极性的几种定义进行测试。 BP-I疾病的主要修订版规范化诊断包括基于附加的A类标准(活动/能量增加)的躁狂发作,未应用任何排除标准。修订后的BP-II疾病包括1-3天的躁狂发作。家族史和疾病历程验证者(一级亲属的躁狂/低躁狂病史,2次或更多次终生发作以及30岁之前发生的首次症状)在符合双极性指定者标准的双相I型或双相II型患者与那些使用MDD。规范定义提供了更好的MDD和两个双极子组之间的区分。符合MDD标准的患者与符合双相分类标准的患者之间的并发合并症模式也存在显着差异。双相I型和双相II型患者的合并症类型有所不同。这项研究为经修改的(指定者)BP-1和BPII定义的有效性提供了证据,这些定义结合了病程和家族史,从而减轻了双相I型和双相II型疾病与MDD之间主要抑郁发作的歧义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号