首页> 外文OA文献 >Evidence-based definitions of bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders among 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes in the Bridge Study: validity and comorbidity
【2h】

Evidence-based definitions of bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders among 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes in the Bridge Study: validity and comorbidity

机译:桥梁研究中5,635名重大抑郁发作患者双极-I和双极-II疾病的基于证据的定义:有效性和合并症

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The definitions of bipolar-I (BP-I) and bipolar-II (BP-II) disorders are currently under revision by the APA and by the WHO. We provide evidence of a revised set of criteria for bipolar disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD) which could serve to strengthen the construct and predictive validity of both disorders and enable more incisive studies of treatments and courses of both disorders. In the diagnostic Bridge Study of 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes from 18 countries (Europe, North Africa, Near East and Far East) leading psychiatrists in each country assessed a pre-specified group of symptoms, illness course, family history and duration of episodes; these data allowed tests of several definitions of bipolarity. The primary revised specifier diagnosis of BP-I disorder included manic episodes based on an additional category A criterion (increased activity/energy) and did not apply any exclusion criteria. The revised BP-II disorders included hypomanic episodes of 1-3 days. Family history and illness course validators (history of mania/hypomania among first degree relatives, 2 or more lifetime episodes and first symptoms having occurred before age 30) discriminated clearly between patients with bipolar-I or bipolar-II disorders meeting bipolarity specifier criteria and those with MDD. Specifier definitions provided better discrimination between MDD and the two bipolar subgroups. Patterns of concurrent comorbidities also differed significantly between patients meeting criteria for MDD compared with those meeting bipolar specifier criteria. Comorbidity patterns differed between bipolar-I and bipolar-II patients. This study provides evidence for the validity of modified (specifier) BP-I and BP-II definitions that incorporate illness course and family history which reduce ambiguities of major depressive episodes between bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders and MDD.
机译:双极-I(BP-I)和BiPolar-II(BP-II)疾病的定义目前由APA和世卫组织修订。我们提供了一系列经过修订的双极性疾病和主要抑郁症(MDD)的标准,该标准可以用于加强两种疾病的构建和预测有效性,并使对两种疾病的治疗和课程进行更加敏锐的研究。在诊断桥梁研究5,635名患有来自18个国家的主要抑郁发作患者(欧洲,北非,东部和远东)领先的每个国家的精神科医生评估了预先指定的症状,疾病课程,家族史和剧集持续时间;这些数据允许测试几个双极性定义。基于额外类别的标准(增加活动/能量),主要修正的标准符包括贩卖官方剧集的诊断,并且没有应用任何排除标准。修订后的BP-II疾病包括1-3天的低位发作。家庭历史和疾病课程验证器(躁狂症疾病疾病的历史,在第30岁之前发生了2岁或更多的终身剧集和第一个症状)明确地歧视了患有双极性规范标准的双相机-I或双极性-II疾病和那些用mdd。说明符定义提供了MDD和两个双极子组之间的更好的歧视。与会议双极说明书标准相比,同时合并症的模式在符合MDD标准之间也有显着不同。双极-I和双极-II患者之间的合并图案不同。本研究为改进的(说明书)BP-I和BP-II定义的有效性提供了涉及疾病课程和家族史的证据,这些历史减少了双极 - I和双极性 - II疾病和MDD之间的主要抑郁发作的含量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号