首页> 外文期刊>European journal of human genetics: EJHG >Replication of past candidate loci for common diseases and phenotypes in 100 genome-wide association studies.
【24h】

Replication of past candidate loci for common diseases and phenotypes in 100 genome-wide association studies.

机译:在100个全基因组关联研究中复制常见疾病和表型的过去候选基因座。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have created a paradigm shift in discovering genetic associations for common diseases and phenotypes, but it is unclear whether the thousands of candidate genetic association studies performed in the pre-GWAS era had found any reliable associations for common diseases and phenotypes. We aimed to systematically evaluate whether loci proposed to harbor candidate associations before the advent of GWASs are replicated in GWASs. The GWAS data published through August, 2008 and included in the NHGRI catalog were screened and variants in candidate loci were selected on the basis of statistical significance (P<0.05) to create a list of independent, non-redundant associations. Altogether, 159 articles on GWASs were evaluated, 100 of which addressed past proposed candidate loci. A total of 291 independent, nominally significant (P<0.05) candidate gene associations were assembled after keeping only the SNP with lowest P-value for each locus and each phenotype; 108 of those had P<10(-3) for association and 41 had P<10(-7). A total of 22 of these 41 candidate gene associations pertained to binary phenotypes with a median odds ratio=2.91 (IQR: 1.82-4.6) and median minor allele frequency=0.17 (IQR: 0.12-0.29) in Caucasians; for comparison, 60 new associations of binary outcomes with P<10(-7) discovered in the same GWASs had much smaller effects (median odds ratio 1.30, IQR: 1.18-1.58) and modestly larger minor allele frequencies (median 0.27, IQR: 0.15-0.43). Overall, few of the numerous genetic associations proposed in the candidate gene era have been replicated in GWASs, but those that have been conclusively replicated have large genetic effects that should not be discarded.
机译:全基因组关联研究(GWAS)在发现常见疾病和表型的遗传关联方面产生了范式转变,但是尚不清楚在GWAS之前的时代进行的成千上万个候选遗传关联研究是否发现了常见疾病的可靠关联和表型。我们旨在系统地评估在GWAS出现之前,是否提议提议在GWAS出现之前保留候选协会的基因座。筛选出截至2008年8月发布的,包括在NHGRI目录中的GWAS数据,并根据统计显着性(P <0.05)选择候选基因座的变体,以创建独立的非冗余关联列表。总共评估了159篇有关GWAS的文章,其中100篇针对过去提议的候选基因座。在每个位点和每个表型仅保留具有最低P值的SNP之后,总共装配了291个独立的,名义上有意义的(P <0.05)候选基因关联。其中108人的P <10(-3)有关联,而41人的P <10(-7)。在这41个候选基因协会中,共有22个属于二元表型,白种人的中位优势比= 2.91(IQR:1.82-4.6),中位次要等位基因频率= 0.17(IQR:0.12-0.29)。为了进行比较,在同一GWAS中发现的60个新的P <10(-7)的二进制结果关联具有较小的影响(中位数比值比1.30,IQR:1.18-1.58)和适度较大的次要等位基因频率(中位数0.27,IQR: 0.15-0.43)。总体而言,在候选基因时代提出的众多遗传关联中,很少有在GWAS中复制的,但最终复制的关联具有巨大的遗传效应,不应丢弃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号