首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Soil Science >Estimating the local mean for Bayesian maximum entropy by generalized least squares and maximum likelihood, and an application to the spatial analysis of a censored soil variable
【24h】

Estimating the local mean for Bayesian maximum entropy by generalized least squares and maximum likelihood, and an application to the spatial analysis of a censored soil variable

机译:通过广义最小二乘和最大似然估计贝叶斯最大熵的局部均值,并将其应用于删失土壤变量的空间分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Bayesian maximum entropy (BME) method is a valuable tool, with rigorous theoretical underpinnings, with which to predict with soft (imprecise) data. The methodology uses a general knowledge base to derive a joint prior distribution of the data andthe prediction by the criterion of maximum entropy; the hard (precise) and soft data are then processed using this prior distribution to yield a posterior distribution that provides the BME prediction. The general knowledge base commonly consists of themean and covariance functions, which may be extracted from the data. The common method for extracting the mean function from the data is a generalized least squares (GLS) approach. However, when the soft data take the form of intervals of plausible values, this method can result in errors in the BME predictions. This paper suggests a maximum likelihood (ML) method for fitting the local mean. The two methods are compared in terms of their predictions, firstly on simulated random fields and then on a case study to predict the depth of soil using some censored data. The results show that the ML method can result in more accurate BME predictions; the degree of improvement over the GLS method depends on the parameters of the spatial covariance model.
机译:贝叶斯最大熵(BME)方法是一种有价值的工具,具有严格的理论基础,可使用它们来预测软(不精确)数据。该方法利用一个通用知识库来导出数据的联合先验分布和根据最大熵的准则进行预测;然后,使用此先验分布处理硬(精确)数据和软数据,以产生提供BME预测的后验分布。通用知识库通常包含主题函数和协方差函数,可以从数据中提取它们。从数据中提取均值函数的常用方法是广义最小二乘(GLS)方法。但是,当软数据采用合理值间隔的形式时,此方法可能会导致BME预测出错。本文提出了一种用于拟合局部均值的最大似然(ML)方法。首先,在模拟的随机场上比较这两种方法的预测,然后在使用某些审查数据预测土壤深度的案例研究中对这两种方法进行了比较。结果表明,ML方法可以使BME预测更加准确。 GLS方法的改进程度取决于空间协方差模型的参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号