首页> 外文期刊>European journal of heart failure: journal of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology >The prognostic significance of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a literature-based meta-analysis.
【24h】

The prognostic significance of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a literature-based meta-analysis.

机译:保留左心室射血分数对心力衰竭的预后意义:基于文献的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) with normal or preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFPEF) has been reported to be associated with similar outcome as HF with reduced EF (HFREF) in registry-based and epidemiological analyses, but many of these studies excluded patients who did not have EF measurements. Conversely, prior prospective studies have reported better outcome for patients with HFPEF. We performed a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies comparing all-cause mortality in patients with HFREF and HFPEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched several online databases for studies comparing outcome in HFREF and HFPEF, published before 2007. Inclusion criteria: prospective, clinical HF, near complete EF data, and mortality outcome. Review Manager version 4.2.3 software was used for the analysis. Overall, 24 501 patients [9299 deaths (38%)] from 17 studies are included. Average follow-up was 47 months; the HFPEF group was older (69 vs. 66 years) and more likely to be female (44% vs. 26%). Of the 7688 patients with HFPEF 2468 died (32.1%), compared with 6831 of the 16 813 patients with HFREF (40.6%): odds ratio 0.51 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.55). CONCLUSION: This literature-based meta-analysis demonstrates that mortality among patients with HFPEF was half that observed in those with HFREF, in contrast to previous reports suggesting that mortality may be similar between both groups.
机译:目的:在基于注册表和流行病学的分析中,据报道具有正常或保留左心室射血分数(HFPEF)的心力衰竭(HF)与EF降低(HFREF)的HF具有相似的结果,但其中许多研究排除了没有进行EF测量的患者。相反,先前的前瞻性研究报道了HFPEF患者的预后较好。我们对前瞻性观察研究进行了荟萃分析,比较了HFREF和HFPEF患者的全因死亡率。方法和结果:我们搜索了多个在线数据库,以比较HFREF和HFPEF的结果,该研究于2007年之前发布。纳入标准:前瞻性,临床HF,近乎完整的EF数据以及死亡率。分析使用了Review Manager 4.2.3版软件。总共纳入了17项研究中的24 501例患者[9299例死亡(38%)]。平均随访47个月。 HFPEF组年龄较大(69岁vs. 66岁),更可能是女性(44%vs. 26%)。在7688例HFPEF 2468患者中死亡(32.1%),而16 813例HFREF患者中的6831(40.6%):优势比为0.51(95%CI:0.48,0.55)。结论:这项基于文献的荟萃分析表明,HFPEF患者的死亡率仅为HFREF患者的一半,而先前的报道则表明两组之间的死亡率可能相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号