...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between 'non-mass' and 'mass' type invasive ductal breast cancers?
【24h】

Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between 'non-mass' and 'mass' type invasive ductal breast cancers?

机译:“非大量”和“大量”型浸润性导管癌与预后因素是否有不同的相关性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To investigate the association between non-mass type breast cancer and common clinical-pathological prognostic factors, compared with mass type breast cancer. Materials and methods After institutional review board approval, retrospective blind review of contrast-enhanced breast MRI was carried out for 88 histologically proven breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients, presenting from January 2008 to December 2011. Two radiologists assessed the images of each lesion for the morphologic enhancement type [mass enhancement or non-mass-like enhancement (NMLE)] and the distribution/internal enhancement of NMLE. Two pathologists evaluated the histological grade of IDC, presence or absence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), lymph node status, presence or absence of vascular invasion, and expression status of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/HER-2/p53 tumor suppressor gene (p53)/Ki-67. Inter-observer agreement was assessed with kappa test. Chi-square test and Spearman rank correlation were performed to explore the associations of morphologic enhancement type with the age, lesion size and the above pathological prognostic factors Results Inter-observer agreement was excellent, with kappa > 0.75. Morphologic enhancement type was significantly correlated with age (P = 0.02), with NMLE more commonly seen in women less than 50 y/o. The size of NMLE was larger than that of mass and, with the increase of lesion size, proportion of NMLE among the cases increased (P = 0.001). NMLE was also significantly correlated with low histologic grade of IDC (P = 0.003) and presence of DCIS (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between morphologic enhancement type and lymph node status, vascular invasion, ER/PR/HER-2/p53/Ki-67 status. The histological grade was higher in clumped enhancement than non-clumped (P = 0.011). There was no correlation between enhancement distribution and prognostic factors Conclusions Non-mass type breast cancer may not necessarily have worse prognosis than the mass type, due to lower histological grade and closely related to DCIS component, although it may has larger tumor size. Clumped enhancement may have worse prognosis than non-clumped enhancement.
机译:目的探讨非肿块型乳腺癌与肿块型乳腺癌相比与常见临床病理预后因素之间的关系。材料和方法经机构审查委员会批准,从2008年1月至2011年12月对88例经组织学证实的乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)患者进行了对比增强乳腺MRI回顾性盲检查。两名放射科医生评估了每个病变的图像适用于形态增强类型[质量增强或非质量类增强(NMLE)]和NMLE的分布/内部增强。两名病理学家评估了IDC的组织学等级,是否存在原位导管癌(DCIS),淋巴结状态,是否存在血管浸润以及雌激素受体(ER)/孕激素受体(PR)/ HER-的表达状态2 / p53抑癌基因(p53)/ Ki-67。观察者之间的协议通过kappa测试进行评估。进行卡方检验和Spearman等级相关性,以探讨形态学增强类型与年龄,病变大小和上述病理预后因素之间的关系。结果观察者之间的一致性很好,kappa> 0.75。形态学增强类型与年龄显着相关(P = 0.02),NMLE在小于50岁的女性中更为常见。 NMLE的大小大于肿块的大小,并且随着病变大小的增加,病例中NMLE的比例增加(P = 0.001)。 NMLE还与IDC的组织学评分低(P = 0.003)和DCIS的存在(P <0.001)显着相关。形态学增强类型与淋巴结状态,血管浸润,ER / PR / HER-2 / p53 / Ki-67状态之间无显着相关性。结块增强的组织学评分高于非结块(P = 0.011)。结论增强型分布与预后因素之间没有相关性。结论非肿块型乳腺癌的预后可能不一定比肿块型差,这是因为其组织学评分较低且与DCIS成分密切相关,尽管它可能具有较大的肿瘤大小。聚集增强可能比非聚集增强的预后更差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号