首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: Value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography
【24h】

Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: Value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography

机译:颈动脉支架置入术和随访:64-MSCT血管造影作为彩色双工超声检查的补充成像方法的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare 64-multi-slice-CT angiography (64-MSCTA) to color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) in the follow-up after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: Thirty patients who had an MSCTA and CCDS examination prior and after CAS were included. Twelve closed-cell and 24 open-cell stents were implanted. Neointimal surface, in-stent-restenosis (ISR), stent expansion, and fracture were evaluated. In addition, the occurrence of atherosclerotic lesions leading to a > 50% stenosis in supraaortic vessels was assessed. Results: With MSCTA, >50% ISR was found in 5.6% of cases during a mean follow-up of 41.7 months. Comparing MSCTA and CCDS, grading of ISR and absolute diameters of neointimal surface correlated moderately (Spearman = 0.402, p = 0.015; Pearson = 0.404, p = 0.03). Assessment of the neointimal surface was significantly better with MSCTA (100% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.011). Stent expansion was significant, compared to the basic value, with both modalities and stent types (p < 0.001). Of 237 additionally assessed vessel segments, a > 50% stenosis was detected in 38 (16.0%) vessel segments. Findings were stable in 25 (10.5%) and progressed in 11 (4.6%) vessel segments. Five small intracranial aneurysms were detected in four (13.3%) patients. Of 21 incidental findings in 16 (51.6%) patients there was one with malignancy (4.8%). Conclusion: With regard to ISR and stent expansion, no significant difference was found, when MSCTA and CCDS were compared. CTA is quite applicable as a complementary imaging method for the follow-up of patients with carotid artery stents. Additional advantages are the detection of supraaortic vessel pathologies and incidental findings.
机译:目的:在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)之后的随访中,将64层螺旋CT血管造影术(64-MSCTA)与彩色双工超声检查(CCDS)进行比较。方法:纳入30例CAS前后接受MSCTA和CCDS检查的患者。植入了十二个闭孔支架和24个开孔支架。评价新内膜表面,支架内再狭窄(ISR),支架扩张和骨折。此外,评估了动脉粥样硬化病变的发生,该病变导致主动脉上血管狭窄> 50%。结果:使用MSCTA,平均随访41.7个月,在5.6%的病例中发现> 50%的ISR。比较MSCTA和CCDS,ISR的等级和新内膜表面的绝对直径有适度的相关性(Spearman = 0.402,p = 0.015; Pearson = 0.404,p = 0.03)。 MSCTA对新内膜表面的评估明显更好(100%比80.6%; p = 0.011)。与基本值相比,支架的扩张方式和支架类型均显着(p <0.001)。在237个另外评估的血管段中,在38个(16.0%)血管段中检测到狭窄> 50%。在25(10.5%)处发现稳定,在11(4.6%)处发现进展。在四名(13.3%)患者中检测到五次小颅内动脉瘤。 16例患者中有21例偶然发现(51.6%),其中1例患有恶性肿瘤(4.8%)。结论:就ISR和支架扩张而言,当比较MSCTA和CCDS时,没有发现显着差异。 CTA非常适合作为颈动脉支架患者随访的补充成像方法。其他优点是可检测主动脉上血管病变和偶然发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号