首页> 外文期刊>European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Double-balloon endoscopy: An effective rescue procedure after incomplete conventional colonoscopy
【24h】

Double-balloon endoscopy: An effective rescue procedure after incomplete conventional colonoscopy

机译:双气囊内窥镜检查:不完全常规结肠镜检查后的有效挽救程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: A significant percentage of colonoscopies remain incomplete because of a failure to intubate the caecum. By double-balloon endoscopy (DBE), originally developed for deep enteroscopy, an otherwise incomplete examination of the colon might be completed. We evaluated the success rate of caecal intubation, the reasons for its failure and the therapeutic consequences of using DBE after incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Methods: We report our single-centre experience of using DBE to complete an otherwise incomplete colonoscopy. A total of 114 consecutive patients, 45 male and 69 female, with a mean age of 64.8 years, who had undergone 116 procedures, were evaluated retrospectively by a review of their medical records. Results: The main causes for failed caecal intubation using a conventional colonoscope were loop formation in 70 patients (61.4%) and an adhesive angulated sigmoid in 33 (28.9%). Caecal intubation by DBE was successful in 101 patients (88.6%). The rate of failure was not associated with the cause of failure of the previous colonoscopy. In 55 patients (48.2%) a relevant new diagnosis was made in the previously inaccessible part of the colon: carcinoma (n=4; 3.5%), one or more adenomas (n=48; 42.1%) and caecal flat hyperplastic polyps (n=4; 3.5%). Endoscopic polypectomy was performed in 51 patients (44.7%); two complications occurred, both being mild postpolypectomy bleedings. In seven patients (6.1%) a subsequent surgical resection was performed. Conclusion: Colonoscopy by DBE was useful in most patients in whom conventional colonoscopy was incomplete, irrespective of the cause of the failure. In nearly half the patients, a relevant new diagnosis was made with therapeutic consequences.
机译:目的:由于无法插入盲肠,很大比例的结肠镜检查仍不完整。通过最初为深肠镜检查而开发的双气囊内窥镜检查(DBE),可能会完成对结肠的其他不完整检查。我们评估了盲肠插管的成功率,失败的原因以及常规结肠镜检查不完全后使用DBE的治疗效果。方法:我们报告了使用DBE完成原本不完整的结肠镜检查的单中心经验。通过回顾其病历,回顾性评估了总共114例连续患者,其中男45例,女69例,平均年龄64.8岁,接受了116例手术。结果:使用常规结肠镜检查导致盲肠插管失败的主要原因是70例患者中形成环(61.4%)和33例中有角度的乙状结肠(28.9%)。 DBE成功进行盲肠插管治疗101例患者(88.6%)。失败率与先前结肠镜检查失败的原因无关。在55例患者(48.2%)中,在先前无法接近的结肠部分做出了相关的新诊断:癌(n = 4; 3.5%),一个或多个腺瘤(n = 48; 42.1%)和盲肠扁平增生性息肉( n = 4; 3.5%)。内镜下息肉切除术51例(44.7%)。发生了两种并发症,均为轻度息肉切除术后出血。在七名患者(6.1%)中,进行了后续的手术切除。结论:DBE结肠镜检查可用于大多数常规结肠镜检查不完整的患者,无论其失败原因如何。在将近一半的患者中,做出了具有治疗效果的相关新诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号