Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy for Simple Adhesive Postoperative Intestinal Obstruction in Children: Comparison of the Use of a Short Tube versus a Long Tube.

摘要

We hypothesized that hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) combined with a long tube (LT) [HBO + LT] would be more effective than HBO combined with a short tube (ST) [HBO + ST] for simple adhesive postoperative intestinal obstruction (APIO) in children, assuming that there is synergism between HBO and LT. The objective of this study was to determine retrospectively the effect of HBO + LT compared to HBO + ST for simple APIO in children. Seventy-three patients were diagnosed with simple APIO, and 51 of these patients were treated with HBO + LT during 104 HBO sessions, while 22 were treated with HBO + ST during 34 HBO sessions. HBO was performed at a pressure of 2 atmospheres for 60 minutes once daily. The recovery rates after HBO therapy were 87.5 % for the HBO + LT group and 82.4 % for the HBO + ST group (p = 0.4496). HBO was performed 5 +/- 3 (range 1 to 15) times for the HBO + LT group and 4 +/- 2 (range 1 to 8) times for the HBO + ST group (p = 0.9847) for ultimate recovery from simple APIO. The recovery rate after HBO therapy of up to 6 sessions was 78.2 % for HBO + LT and 92.1 % for HBO + ST (p = 0.0360) among the cases that recovered ultimately. The effect of HBO + LT did not significantly differ from that of HBO + ST, but the insertion of an LT is more intricate and the cost is higher than that of an ST. Therefore, we conclude that the use of an LT is not necessarily required for HBO therapy for simple APIO.