...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >The clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale: A systematic review
【24h】

The clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale: A systematic review

机译:COMFORT秤的临床特性:系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The COMFORT scale is a measurement tool to assess distress, sedation and pain in nonverbal paediatric patients. Several studies have described the COMFORT scale, but no formal assessment of the methodological quality has been undertaken. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to study the clinimetric properties of the (modified) COMFORT scale in children up to 18years. We searched Central, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science until December 2014. The selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Quality of the included studies was appraised using the COSMIN checklist. We found 30 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were ventilated children up to 4years without neurological disorders. The results on internal consistency and interrater reliability showed values of >0.70 in most studies, indicating an adequate reliability. Construct validity resulted in correlations between 0.68 and 0.84 for distress, between 0.42 and 0.94 for sedation and between 0.31 and 0.96 for pain. The responsiveness of the (modified) COMFORT scale seems to be adequate. The quality of the included studies ranged from poor to excellent. The COMFORT scale shows overall an adequate reliability in providing information on distress, sedation and pain. Construct validity varies from good to excellent for distress, from moderate to excellent for sedation, and from poor to excellent for pain. The included studies were clinically and methodologically heterogeneous, hampering firm conclusions.
机译:COMFORT量表是一种评估工具,用于评估非言语儿科患者的困扰,镇静和疼痛。一些研究描述了COMFORT量表,但尚未对方法学质量进行正式评估。因此,我们进行了系统的综述,以研究(改良的)COMFORT量表在18岁以下儿童中的临床特征。我们搜索了Central,CINAHL,Embase,Medline,PsycInfo和Web of Science,直到2014年12月。选择,数据提取和质量评估由两名审核员独立进行。使用COSMIN清单评估纳入研究的质量。我们发现30项符合纳入标准的研究。多数参与者为4岁以下无神经系统疾病的通气儿童。在大多数研究中,内部一致性和间隔可靠性的结果显示> 0.70,表明足够的可靠性。构建效度的结果表明,苦恼的相关性在0.68和0.84之间,镇静的相关性在0.42和0.94之间,疼痛的相关性在0.31和0.96之间。 (修改后的)COMFORT量表的响应能力似乎足够。纳入研究的质量从差到优。总体而言,COMFORT量表在提供有关窘迫,镇静和疼痛的信息方面显示出足够的可靠性。构造效度从苦难的好到好,镇静的好到好,痛苦的差到好。纳入的研究在临床和方法上均是异质的,妨碍了可靠的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号