首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (‐Revised): A systematic review
【2h】

Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (‐Revised): A systematic review

机译:伤害性昏迷量表的临床质量(修订):系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Nociception Coma Scale is a nociception behaviour observation tool, developed specifically for patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) due to (acquired) brain injury. Over the years, the clinimetric properties of the NCS and its revised version (NCS‐R) have been assessed, but no formal summary of these properties has been made. Therefore, we performed a systematic review on the clinimetric properties (i.e. reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability) of the NCS(‐R). We systematically searched CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Web of Science until August 2015. Two reviewers independently selected the clinimetric studies and extracted data with a structured form. Included studies were appraised on quality with the COSMIN checklist. Eight studies were found eligible and were appraised with the COSMIN checklist. Although nearly all studies lacked sample size calculation, and were executed by the same group of authors, the methodological quality ranged from fair to excellent. Important aspects of reliability, construct validity and responsiveness have been studied in depth and with sufficient methodological quality. The overview of clinimetric properties in this study shows that the NCS and NCS‐R are both valid and useful instruments to assess nociceptive behaviour in DOC patients. The studies provide guidance for the choice in NCS‐R cut‐off value for possible pain treatment and cautions awareness of interprofessional differences in NCS‐R measurements.
机译:伤害感受昏迷量表是一种伤害感受行为观察工具,专门针对因(后天)脑损伤而导致的意识障碍(DOC)的患者而开发。多年来,已经对NCS及其修订版本(NCS-R)的斜度特性进行了评估,但是尚未对这些特性进行正式的总结。因此,我们对NCS(‐R)的斜度特性(即可靠性,有效性,响应性和可解释性)进行了系统的审查。直到2015年8月,我们系统地搜索了CENTRAL,CINAHL,Embase,PsycInfo和Web of Science。两名评论者独立选择了临床研究,并以结构化形式提取了数据。纳入的研究用COSMIN清单评估了质量。发现八项研究符合条件并通过COSMIN清单进行了评估。尽管几乎所有研究都缺乏样本量计算,并且是由同一组作者执行的,但是方法学的质量从中等到优秀。可靠性,构建效度和响应能力的重要方面已经进行了深入研究,并具有足够的方法论质量。本研究的斜度特性概述表明,NCS和NCS-R都是评估DOC患者伤害感受行为的有效手段。这些研究为选择可能的疼痛治疗的NCS-R临界值提供了指导,并提醒人们注意NCS-R测量中的专业间差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号