...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer prevention: The official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) >Participation in a colorectal cancer screening programme: influence of the method of contacting the target population.
【24h】

Participation in a colorectal cancer screening programme: influence of the method of contacting the target population.

机译:参与大肠癌筛查计划:接触目标人群的方法的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed the effect of two different methods of contacting the target population on the rate of participation in a colorectal cancer screening programme. All individuals aged between 50 and 74 years enlisted in one primary health care centre in Barcelona (Spain) were included in a prospective randomized controlled trial. An invitation letter signed by a doctor together with two containers for faecal sample collection were sent by post to subjects in the 'standard' group (n = 1060), while subjects in the 'study' group (direct contact, n = 965) were visited by a trained non-health professional who supplied them with the same documentation as the standard group. The screening test consisted of an immunological method for the detection of faecal blood which does not require any prior specific dietary measures. Specimens were collected on two successive days. A significantly higher participation was observed in the study group (557/965, 57.7%) compared with the standard group (388/1060, 36.5%, P < 0.005). Specimen collection correctness was also higher in the study group (419/557, 75.1%) compared with the standard group (262/388, 67.5%, P < 0.014). There were no differences in terms of either age group or sex for the participation, nor for degree of correctness of specimen collection. Participation and specimen collection can be raised in colorectal cancer screening programmes by means of an invitation made through direct contact by a suitably trained non-health professional.
机译:我们评估了接触目标人群的两种不同方法对结肠直肠癌筛查计划参与率的影响。在巴塞罗那(西班牙)的一家初级保健中心中征募的所有年龄在50至74岁之间的个体均纳入一项前瞻性随机对照试验。将由医生签名的邀请函和两个用于收集粪便样品的容器邮寄给“标准”组(n = 1060)中的受试者,而“研究”组(直接接触,n = 965)中的受试者由受过训练的非保健专业人员来访,他们为他们提供了与标准组相同的文档。筛查测试由用于检测粪便血液的免疫学方法组成,该方法不需要任何事先的特定饮食措施。连续两天收集标本。与标准组(388/1060,36.5%,P <0.005)相比,研究组(557/965,57.7%)的参与度显着更高。与标准组(262 / 388,67.5%,P <0.014)相比,研究组(419 / 557,75.1%)的标本采集正确性也更高。参与的年龄组或性别均无差异,样本采集的正确性也无差异。可以通过受过适当培训的非卫生专业人员直接联系的邀请,来提高大肠癌筛查计划的参与度和标本收集率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号