...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Identifying a long-term/chronic, non-cancer pain population using a one-dimensional verbal pain rating scale: an epidemiological study.
【24h】

Identifying a long-term/chronic, non-cancer pain population using a one-dimensional verbal pain rating scale: an epidemiological study.

机译:使用一维言语疼痛评估量表确定长期/慢性非癌性疼痛人群:一项流行病学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The usefulness of the verbal pain rating scale (VRS) included in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in identifying characteristics of long-term pain conditions, was analyzed using data from the 1994 Danish Health and Morbidity Survey. Based on the rating of pain intensity during a 4-week recall period the respondents were categorized into three groups: a high pain group (HPG) consisting of persons reporting moderate to severe pain (VRS 4-6), a low pain group (LPG) who rated their pain as very mild or mild (VRS 2-3), and a control group (CG) with no pain (VRS 1). The investigated sample comprised 3992 persons (HPG=563 persons, LPG=1714, and CG=1715 persons). Older age, educational level (< 10 years of schooling), cohabitation status (divorce/separation), and moderate to severe physical job strain were found to be significant risk factors for reporting high pain intensity (HPG). Only minor differences were observed between the LPG and CG. The proportion of respondents with good perceived health was significantly lower in the HPG compared with LPG and CG. The dominant complaints in the HPG were related to the musculoskeletal system. During a 14-day period prior to the interview persons in the HPG had a mean of 1.19 working days lost due to illness compared with a mean of 0.2 for the LPG and CG. Analyzing the use of medical services during the year before the interview, persons belonging to the HPG had an average number of nine contacts to general practitioners and specialized doctors in the primary sector as compared to six for the LPG and four for the CG. Mean numbers of hospital admissions were 0.29 for the HPG, 0.15 for the LPG and 0.10 for the CG. Mean numbers of in-hospital days were 1.60, 0.80, and 0.43 for the HPG, LPG, and CG, respectively. Our study suggest that one-dimensional pain intensity scoring using a simple VRS-scoring is useful as a screening instrument for identifying persons suffering from pain of a more complex nature. High intensity scores on a pain intensity scale should indicate to the investigator that she/he might be facing a person whose pain complaints and behavior are not only based on a pure biological background, but in whom also severe psychological and social problems might be present.
机译:使用1994年丹麦健康与发病率调查的数据分析了简短表格36(SF-36)中包含的口头疼痛等级量表(VRS)在识别长期疼痛状况特征方面的有用性。根据在4周的回忆期内疼痛强度的等级,将受访者分为三组:高疼痛组(HPG),由报告中度至重度疼痛的人组成(VRS 4-6),低疼痛组(LPG) )的疼痛程度为轻度或轻度(VRS 2-3),无疼痛的对照组(CG)(VRS 1)。被调查的样本包括3992人(HPG = 563人,LPG = 1714和CG = 1715人)。年龄,文化程度(上学时间少于10年),同居状态(离婚/分居)以及中度到重度的身体劳损是报告高疼痛强度(HPG)的重要危险因素。 LPG和CG之间只有很小的差异。与LPG和CG相比,HPG中感觉健康良好的受访者比例显着降低。 HPG中的主要主诉与肌肉骨骼系统有关。在面试之前的14天内,HPG患者因疾病而损失的平均时间为1.19个工作日,而LPG和CG患者的平均损失时间为0.2个工作日。通过分析采访前一年的医疗服务使用情况,属于HPG的人员与第一部门的全科医生和专业医生的平均联系人数为9,而LPG为6,CG为4。 HPG的平均入院数为0.29,LPG的为0.15,CG的为0.10。 HPG,LPG和CG的住院日平均数分别为1.60、0.80和0.43。我们的研究表明,使用简单的VRS评分进行一维疼痛强度评分可作为一种筛查工具,用于识别遭受更复杂性质的疼痛的人。疼痛强度量表上的高强度评分应向研究者表明,她/他可能正面临这样一个人,即该人的疼痛症状和行为不仅基于纯粹的生物学背景,而且还可能存在严重的心理和社会问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号