首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >Practical recommendations for population PK studies with sampling time errors
【24h】

Practical recommendations for population PK studies with sampling time errors

机译:有抽样时间误差的人口PK研究的实用建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) data collected from routine clinical practice offers a rich source of valuable information. However, in observational population PK data, accurate time information for blood samples is often missing, resulting in measurement errors (ME) in the sampling time variable. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects on model parameters when a scheduled time is used instead of the actual blood sampling time, and to proposeME correction methods. Methods: Simulation studies were conducted based on two major factors: the curvature in PK profiles and the size of ME. As ME correction methods, transform both sides (TBS) models were developed with application of Box-Cox power transformation and Taylor expansion. The TBS models were compared to a conventional population PK model using simulations. Results: The most important determinant of bias due to time ME was the degree of curvature (nonlinearity) in PK profiles; the smaller the curvature around sampling times, the smaller the associated bias. The second important determinant was the magnitude of ME; the larger the ME, the larger the bias. The proposed TBS models performed better than a conventional population PK modeling when curvature and ME were substantial. Conclusions: Time ME in sampling time can lead to bias on the parameter estimators. The following practical recommendations are provided: 1) when the curvature of PK profiles is small, conventional population PK modeling is robust to even large ME; and 2) when the curvature is moderate or large, the proposed methodology reduces bias in parameter estimates.
机译:目的:从常规临床实践中收集的群体药代动力学(PK)数据可提供宝贵的信息。但是,在观测人群PK数据中,通常缺少血液样本的准确时间信息,从而导致采样时间变量中的测量误差(ME)。这项研究的目的是调查使用计划时间而不是实际血液采样时间对模型参数的影响,并提出ME校正方法。方法:基于两个主要因素进行了仿真研究:PK曲线的曲率和ME的大小。作为ME校正方法,利用Box-Cox功率变换和泰勒展开法开发了双向变换(TBS)模型。使用模拟将TBS模型与常规人口PK模型进行了比较。结果:时间ME引起的偏差的最重要决定因素是PK曲线的曲率(非线性)。采样时间附近的曲率越小,相关的偏差就越小。第二个重要的决定因素是ME的大小。 ME越大,偏差越大。当曲率和ME较大时,建议的TBS模型的性能要优于传统的人口PK模型。结论:采样时间中的时间ME可能导致参数估计量出现偏差。提供以下实用建议:1)当PK轮廓的曲率较小时,传统的人口PK建模甚至对于较大的ME也很鲁棒; 2)当曲率适中或较大时,所提出的方法减少了参数估计中的偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号