...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer care >Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal treatment for patients on chemotherapy.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal treatment for patients on chemotherapy.

机译:化疗患者抗真菌治疗的成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Invasive fungal infections are fatal complications for patients on chemotherapy, and antifungal prophylactic treatment has been commonly recommended. Because its clinical and economic impact is not well known, we evaluated cost-effectiveness of anti-fungal treatment for patients who were neutropoenic as a result of chemotherapy. We constructed a hypothetical cohort of 40-year-old patients with acute myelogenic leukemia to evaluate years of life survived (YLS), costs (USDollars ), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (USDollars /YLS). The following treatment strategies for fungal infections were compared: (1) prophylactic fluconazole strategy: oral fluconazole administration concurrently with chemotherapy; (2) empirical amphotericin B strategy: empirical intravenous amphotericin B administration at the point where fever is detected; and (3) no prophylaxis strategy: intravenous micafangin administration at the point where fungal infections is diagnosed. Baseline analyses showed that prophylactic fluconazole strategy involved higher costs but also longer YLSs (25,900 USDollars and 24.08 YLS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of prophylactic fluconazole strategy was 625 USDollars /YLS compared to no prophylaxis strategy, and 652 USDollars /YLS compared to empirical amphotericin B strategy. Baseline result was found to be robust through sensitivity analyses. Our study showed that concurrent administration of oral fluconazole during induction chemotherapy appears to ensure clinical benefits together with acceptable cost-effectiveness.
机译:侵袭性真菌感染是化疗患者的致命并发症,通常建议进行抗真菌治疗。由于其临床和经济影响尚不清楚,因此我们评估了因化疗而中性粒细胞减少的患者抗真菌治疗的成本效益。我们构建了一个假设队列,该队列由40岁的急性骨髓性白血病患者组成,用以评估生存年限(YLS),成本(USDollars)和成本效益比(USDollars / YLS)。比较了以下针对真菌感染的治疗策略:(1)预防性氟康唑策略:口服氟康唑与化学疗法并用; (2)经验性两性霉素B策略:在发现发烧时经验性静脉内使用两性霉素B; (3)无预防措施:在诊断出真菌感染时静脉注射米卡芬宁。基线分析显示,预防性氟康唑策略涉及较高的成本,但也需要更长的YLS(25,900美元/美元和24.08 YLS)。预防性氟康唑策略与无预防策略相比的成本效益比为625美元/ YLS,与经验性两性霉素B策略相比为652美元/ YLS。通过敏感性分析发现基线结果是可靠的。我们的研究表明,诱导化疗期间同时口服氟康唑似乎可以确保临床益处以及可接受的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号