...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Satiety scores and satiety hormone response after sucrose-sweetened soft drink compared with isocaloric semi-skimmed milk and with non-caloric soft drink: A controlled trial
【24h】

Satiety scores and satiety hormone response after sucrose-sweetened soft drink compared with isocaloric semi-skimmed milk and with non-caloric soft drink: A controlled trial

机译:蔗糖加糖软饮料与等热量半脱脂牛奶和无热量软饮料相比的饱腹感评分和饱腹激素反应:一项对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background/Objectives:Observational studies indicate that sugar-sweetened soft drinks (SSSD) may promote obesity, among other factors, owing to low-satiating effects. The effect of energy in drinks on appetite is still unclear. We examined the effect of two isocaloric, but macronutrient, different beverages (SSSD versus semi-skimmed milk) and two non-energy-containing beverages (aspartame-sweetened soft drink (ASSD) and water) on appetite, appetite-regulating hormones and energy intake (EI).Subjects/Methods:In all, 24 obese individuals were included in a crossover trial. Each subject was served either 500 ml of SSSD (regular cola: 900 kJ), semi-skimmed milk (950 kJ), ASSD (diet cola: 7.5 kJ), or water. Subjective appetite scores, ghrelin, GLP-1, and GIP concentrations were measured at baseline and continuously 4-h post intake. Ad libitum EI was measured 4 h after intake of the test drinks.Results:Milk induced greater subjective fullness and less hunger than regular cola (P<0.05). Also, milk led to 31% higher GLP-1 (95% CI: 20, 44; P<0.01) and 45% higher GIP (95% CI: 23, 72; P<0.01) concentrations compared with SSSD. Ghrelin was equally 20% lower after milk and SSSD compared with water. The total EI (ad libitum EIEI from the drink) was higher after the energy-containing drinks compared with diet cola and water (P<0.01).Conclusions:Milk increased appetite scores and GLP-1 and GIP responses compared with SSSD. The energy containing beverages were not compensated by decreased EI at the following meal, emphasizing the risk of generating a positive energy balance by consuming energy containing beverages. Furthermore, there were no indications of ASSD increased appetite or EI compared with water.
机译:背景/目的:观测研究表明,含糖软饮料(SSSD)的饱腹感低,可能促进肥胖等其他因素。饮料中的能量对食欲的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了两种等热量但大量营养的饮料(SSSD与半脱脂牛奶)和两种不含能量的饮料(阿斯巴甜加糖软饮料(ASSD)和水)对食欲,食欲调节激素和能量的影响。受试者/方法:总共24名肥胖个体参与了一项交叉试验。每位受试者服用500毫升SSSD(常规可乐:900 kJ),半脱脂牛奶(950 kJ),ASSD(饮食可乐:7.5 kJ)或水。在基线和摄入后4小时连续测量主观食欲评分,生长素释放肽,GLP-1和GIP浓度。摄入受试饮料后4 h随便测量EI。结果:与常规可乐相比,牛奶可引起更大的主观饱腹感和更少的饥饿感(P <0.05)。此外,与SSSD相比,牛奶导致GLP-1浓度升高31%(95%CI:20、44; P <0.01),GIP浓度升高45%(95%CI:23、72; P <0.01)。与牛奶相比,牛奶和SSSD后的Ghrelin含量也降低了20%。含能量饮料后的总EI(随意摄入饮料中的EIEI)高于可乐和水(P <0.01)。结论:与SSSD相比,牛奶的食欲分数,GLP-1和GIP反应增加。含能量饮料不能在下一餐时通过降低EI来补偿,这强调了通过消耗含能量饮料来产生正能量平衡的风险。此外,没有迹象表明与水相比,ASSD的食欲或EI增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号