...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Increased satiety after intake of a chocolate milk drink compared with a carbonated beverage, but no difference in subsequent ad libitum lunch intake.
【24h】

Increased satiety after intake of a chocolate milk drink compared with a carbonated beverage, but no difference in subsequent ad libitum lunch intake.

机译:与碳酸饮料相比,摄入巧克力牛奶饮料后的饱腹感增加,但随后的随意午餐摄入量没有差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rising rate of obesity has been blamed on increased consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks, such as carbonated sodas, which fail to satisfy hunger. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect on appetite and energy intake of a sugar-sweetened beverage (cola) and a chocolate milk drink, matched for energy content and volume. It was hypothesised that chocolate milk may be more satiating because of its protein content. Twenty-two healthy young men (age 23 (SD 1 x 8) years) of normal weight (BMI 22 x 2 (SD 1 x 5) kg/m2) were recruited to the randomised cross-over study. Visual analogue scales were used to record subjective appetite ratings every 30 min on each of two test days. A drink of 500 ml cola or chocolate milk (900 kJ) was ingested 30 min before an ad libitum lunch. Satiety and fullness were significantly greater (P=0 x 0007, P=0 x 0004, respectively) 30 min after chocolate milk than after cola. Ratings of prospective consumption and hunger were significantly greater after cola than after chocolate milk, both immediately after preload intake (P=0 x 008, P=0 x 01, respectively) and 30 min afterwards (P=0 x 004, P=0 x 01, respectively). There was no significant difference (P=0 x 42) in ad libitum lunch intake after ingestion of chocolate milk (3145 (SD 1268) kJ) compared with cola (3286 (SD 1346) kJ). The results support the hypothesis that sweetened soft drinks are different from milk products in their impact on short-term hunger and satiety, although differences in subjective appetite scores were not translated into differences in energy intake.
机译:肥胖率上升归因于糖类汽水(如碳酸汽水)的消费增加,这些饮料无法满足饥饿感。本研究的目的是比较含糖饮料(可乐)和巧克力牛奶饮料对食欲和能量摄入的影响,并根据能量含量和体积进行比较。据推测,巧克力牛奶由于其蛋白质含量可能更令人满意。招募了22名正常体重(BMI 22 x 2(SD 1 x 5)kg / m2)的健康年轻人(23岁(SD 1 x 8)岁)进行随机交叉研究。视觉模拟量表用于在两个测试日的每30分钟记录一次主观食欲等级。在随意午餐前30分钟摄入了500毫升可乐或巧克力牛奶(900 kJ)。巧克力牛奶30分钟后的饱腹感和饱胀感显着高于可乐后(分别为P = 0 x 0007,P = 0 x 0004)。可乐后的预期消费量和饥饿量显着高于巧克力牛奶后,预紧力摄入后(分别为P = 0 x 008,P = 0 x 01)和之后30分钟(P = 0 x 004,P = 0) x 01)。与可乐(3286(SD 1346)kJ)相比,摄入巧克力牛奶(3145(SD 1268)kJ)后随意午餐的摄入量没有显着差异(P = 0 x 42)。该结果支持以下假设:甜味软饮料与牛奶产品在短期饥饿感和饱腹感方面的影响不同,尽管主观食欲评分的差异并未转化为能量摄入的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号