...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Added value of different metabolic syndrome definitions for predicting cardiovascular disease and mortality events among elderly population: Tehran lipid and glucose study
【24h】

Added value of different metabolic syndrome definitions for predicting cardiovascular disease and mortality events among elderly population: Tehran lipid and glucose study

机译:不同代谢综合征定义对预测老年人群心血管疾病和死亡事件的附加价值:德黑兰脂质和葡萄糖研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Objectives: To examine the association between the different definitions of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the prediction of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality events and to determine whether the concept of MetS adds to traditional risk factors among elderly Iranians. Subjects/Methods: The association between MetS and outcomes was examined in 922 adults aged ≥65 years, free of CVD at baseline, using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. To examine whether MetS could enhance prediction of outcomes beyond that achieved by risk factors; the net reclassification improvement index was used. Results: During a median follow-up of 9.9 years, 207 CVD events and 193 deaths (82 CVD deaths) occurred. World health organization (WHO) and the joint interim statement (JIS) definitions were shown to be the strongest predictors of CVD events. The WHO definition predicted CVD and all-cause mortality events (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-2.09) and 2.08 (95% CI = 1.23-3.51), respectively) and the JIS definition showed a risk for CVD mortality (HR = 1.65 (95% CI = 1.03-2.65)). Different definitions of MetS did not add to traditional risk factors in the prediction of different outcomes. Conclusions: The WHO definition was the strongest predictor of CVD and mortality outcomes; however, none of the MetS definitions provided added value to traditional risk factors.
机译:背景/目的:研究代谢综合征(MetS)的不同定义与心血管事件(CVD)和死亡事件的预测之间的关联,并确定MetS的概念是否增加了伊朗老年人的传统危险因素。受试者/方法:采用多元Cox比例风险模型,对922名年龄≥65岁,基线时无CVD的成年人进行了MetS与预后的相关性研究。检查MetS是否可以增强对危险因素所不能达到的结果的预测;使用净重分类改进指标。结果:在9.9年的中位随访期间,发生了207例CVD事件和193例死亡(82例CVD死亡)。世界卫生组织(WHO)和联合临时声明(JIS)定义被证明是CVD事件的最强预测因子。 WHO的定义预测了CVD和全因死亡率事件(危险比(HR)= 1.55(95%置信区间(CI)= 1.15-2.09)和2.08(95%CI = 1.23-3.51))和JIS定义表现出CVD死亡风险(HR = 1.65(95%CI = 1.03-2.65))。在预测不同结局时,MetS的不同定义不会增加传统的风险因素。结论:WHO的定义是CVD和死亡率结果的最强预测因子。但是,大都会气象局的定义都没有为传统风险因素提供增值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号