首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia: a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery.
【24h】

Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia: a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery.

机译:脑状态监测器,一种用于确定麻醉深度的新型小型手持式EEG监测器:与日间手术中双光谱指数的临床比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The cerebral state index (CSI) derived from a new small handheld electroencephalogram monitor was studied during routine day surgical anaesthesia titrated according to the bispectral index (BIS). The objective was to determine the degree of agreement between the two monitors. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl (0.1 mg) in 38 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for routine day-surgery. Maintenance anaesthesia (sevoflurane (20/38), desflurane (10/38) or propofol (8/38)) titrated by BIS XP (Aspect Medical, Natwick, MA, USA) and BIS and CSI (cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter; Odense, Denmark) index values were recorded every minute. No patient received muscle relaxation. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation rating scale was used to assess level of sedation. RESULTS: Pair-wise recordings (914) of CSI and BIS were collected. The indices showed similar pattern and decreased with increasing level of sedation, however with large ranges for each level of sedation. Median indices were similar during surgery (BIS: 50 (14-89); CSI: 51 (7-88)) and both indices increased (P 20% from BIS-index in 24% of readings, and on rare occasions CSI indices deviated >100% from the BIS reading. When BIS < 40, CSI decreased slower than BIS and with wider spreading. CONCLUSIONS: When used for day-surgery anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, CSI and BIS show similar patterns and numerical values but with the incidence of occasionally large discrepancies between pair-wise readings. Which monitor is the more dependable remains to be established and cannot be implied from this initial explorative study.
机译:背景与目的:在常规的一天的手术麻醉中,根据双频谱指数(BIS)滴定,研究了一种新型的小型手持式脑电图监护仪的脑状态指数(CSI)。目的是确定两个监控器之间的一致程度。方法:对38例接受常规麻醉的全麻患者采用丙泊酚和芬太尼(0.1mg)诱导麻醉。维持麻醉(七氟醚(20/38),地氟醚(10/38)或丙泊酚(8/38))通过BIS XP(Aspect Medical,Natwick,MA,USA)和BIS和CSI(脑状态监测仪,Danmeter;欧登塞)滴定(丹麦))每分钟记录一次索引值。没有患者接受肌肉松弛。观察者的警觉性/镇静评估等级量表用于评估镇静水平。结果:收集了CSI和BIS的成对记录(914)。各项指标显示出相似的模式,并且随着镇静水平的提高而降低,但是每个镇静水平的范围都较大。手术期间中位指数相似(BIS:50(14-89); CSI:51(7-88)),两个指数均增加(在24%的读数中,BIS指数P占20%,在极少数情况下CSI指数发生偏差从BIS读数> 100%。当BIS <40时,CSI的下降速度慢于BIS,且散布更广。逐对读数之间有时会有较大差异,哪个监测器更可靠,尚待确定,这一初步的探索性研究无法暗示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号