...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Shorter discharge time after regional or intravenous anaesthesia in combination with laryngeal mask airway compared with balanced anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
【24h】

Shorter discharge time after regional or intravenous anaesthesia in combination with laryngeal mask airway compared with balanced anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

机译:与采用气管内插管的平衡麻醉相比,局部或静脉麻醉与喉罩气道联合后的出院时间更短。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficiency of operating room times can be significantly improved using rapid changes between operative procedures. We performed a retrospective analysis using electronic anaesthesia charts that compared anaesthesia-related times between the three most frequently performed types of anaesthesia (for orthopaedic surgery) to evaluate the potential for a quicker turn-around between cases. METHODS: A total of 5614 anaesthetic procedures in trauma-related orthopaedic surgery were performed from 1997 to 1999. All were documented with an automatic record-keeping system. Data were compared for intravenous anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway, balanced anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and regional anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the time needed for emergence from anaesthesia after the end of surgery. Statistical evaluation was performed with matched triples for all three types of anaesthesia (155 triples for ambulatory surgery, 249 triples for in-patient care). RESULTS: For ambulatory surgery, the induction time was significantly shorter for general anaesthesia (23.7 min for intravenous anaesthesia, 22.7 min for balanced anaesthesia techniques) compared with regional anaesthesia (27.2 min). The time from the end of the surgical procedure to transfer of the patient out of the operating room was shortest for regional anaesthesia (6.3 min) compared with intravenous anaesthesia (9.0 min) and balanced anaesthesia (12.5 min) techniques. Results were comparable for in-patients: regional anaesthesia required significantly longer for its induction, but less time for patient discharge from the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a regional anaesthesia technique or one involving intravenous anaesthesia in combination with the laryngeal mask airway may lead to a reduction in discharge time compared with a balanced anaesthesia technique with endotracheal intubation. Thus, improved use of resources may be achieved.
机译:背景与目的:通过快速改变手术程序,可以显着提高手术室时间的效率。我们使用电子麻醉图进行了回顾性分析,该图表比较了三种最常用的麻醉类型(用于整形外科手术)的麻醉相关时间,以评估病例之间更快的周转时间。方法:自1997年至1999年,在与创伤有关的整形外科手术中共进行了5614例麻醉程序。所有记录均采用自动记录系统进行记录。比较了喉罩气道静脉麻醉,气管插管均衡麻醉和局部麻醉的数据。主要结果指标是手术结束后从麻醉中出来所需的时间。对所有三种麻醉使用匹配的三联进行统计评估(非门诊手术为155三联,住院护理为249三联)。结果:对于非卧床手术,与区域麻醉(27.2分钟)相比,全身麻醉的诱导时间明显缩短(静脉麻醉为23.7分钟,平衡麻醉为22.7分钟)。与静脉麻醉(9.0分钟)和平衡麻醉(12.5分钟)相比,从区域麻醉(6.3分钟)到从手术结束到从手术室转移出患者的时间最短。对于住院患者来说,结果是可比的:区域麻醉所需的诱导时间明显更长,但从手术室出院的时间却更少。结论:与采用气管插管的平衡麻醉技术相比,使用区域麻醉技术或将静脉麻醉与喉罩呼吸道结合使用可减少出院时间。因此,可以实现资源的改进利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号