首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for gynaecological outpatient procedures.
【24h】

Spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for gynaecological outpatient procedures.

机译:妇科门诊使用异丙酚和瑞芬太尼进行脊髓阻滞或全静脉麻醉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the preparation and discharge times, the side-effects and patient satisfaction after gynaecological outpatient procedures performed using either spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. METHODS: With Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, 40 healthy females scheduled for hysteroscopic ablation of endometrial neoplasm were randomly allocated to receive either a spinal block with bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric solution 10 mg (n = 20) or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (n = 20). Preparation and discharge times, as well as occurrence of untoward events and anaesthesia-related costs, were recorded. RESULTS: The median (range) preparation time was 7 (7-10) min with general anaesthesia, and 11 (7-21) min with spinal block (P = 0.00005). No differences in discharge time from the postanaesthesia care unit and incidence of hypotension or bradycardia, or both, were reported between the two groups. Hospital discharge times were 156 (101-345) min after general anaesthesia and 296 (195-720) min after spinal anaesthesia (P = 0.0005). Acceptance of the anaesthesia technique was better after general (100%) than after spinal anaesthesia (75%) (P = 0.04). No differences in total costs were reported between spinal block ([symbol: see text] 155 ([symbol: see text] 117-[symbol: see text] 224)) and propofol-remifentanil general anaesthesia ([symbol: see text] 143 ([symbol: see text] 124-[symbol: see text] 203) (P = 0.125)). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate titration of short-acting intravenous anaesthetic drugs such as propofol and remifentanil results in shorter preparation times and earlier home discharge after outpatient gynaecological procedures compared with spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, with better patient acceptance and no increased costs.
机译:背景与目的:这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较使用异丙酚和瑞芬太尼进行脊柱阻滞或全静脉麻醉的妇科门诊手术后的准备和出院时间,副作用和患者满意度。方法:经伦理委员会批准并获得知情同意书,随机安排40名接受宫腔镜子宫内膜肿瘤消融术的健康女性,接受接受布比卡因0.5%高压溶液10 mg(n = 20)的脊柱阻滞或接受异丙酚和瑞芬太尼(n = 20)。记录准备和出院时间,以及不良事件的发生和麻醉相关的费用。结果:全身麻醉的中位(范围)准备时间为7(7-10)分钟,脊柱阻滞为11(7-21)分钟(P = 0.00005)。两组之间麻醉后护理单位的出院时间和低血压或心动过缓的发生率或两者均无差异。全身麻醉后住院时间为156(101-345)分钟,脊柱麻醉后为296(195-720)分钟(P = 0.0005)。全身麻醉(100%)后的麻醉技术接受度比脊椎麻醉后(75%)的接受度更好(P = 0.04)。脊髓阻滞([符号:参见文本] 155([符号:参见文本] 117- [符号:参见文本] 224))与异丙酚-瑞芬太尼全身麻醉([符号:参见文本] 143)之间的总费用没有差异。 ([符号:参见文本] 124- [符号:参见文本] 203)(P = 0.125))。结论:与高压麻醉性布比卡因10 mg脊柱麻醉相比,准确的滴定短效静脉麻醉药(如丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼)可在门诊妇科手术后缩短准备时间并提早出院,患者接受高压布比卡因10 mg的麻醉效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号